[求助]大全-20-3(懇請路過大俠傳授秘笈)

swiss0204

連結自
    http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=24&ID=55026&page=1

請各位NN 幫個忙~~~~ 萬分感激~~~!!!

Q3.

Last year in the United States, women who ran for state and national offices were

about as likely to win as men. However, only about fifteen percent of the

candidates for these offices were women. Therefore, the reason there are so

few women who win elections for these offices is not that women have difficulty

winning elections but that so few women want to run.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the conclusion given?

(A) Last year the proportion of women incumbents who won reelection was

smaller than the proportion of men incumbents who won reelection.

(B) Few women who run for state and national offices run against other women.

(C) Most women who have no strong desire to be politicians never run for state

and national offices.

(D) The proportion of people holding local offices who are women is smaller than

the proportion of people holding state and national offices who are women.（E）

(E) Many more women than men who want to run for state and national offices

do not because they cannot get adequate funding for their campaigns.

ANS: E

è
   我的思路:

Last year in the United States, women who ran for state and

national offices were about as likely to win as men. However, only about

fifteen percent of the candidates for these offices were women. ( Fact )

 

 

 

Therefore, the reason there are so few women who win elections for these

offices is not that women have difficulty winning elections but that so few

women want to run. ( conclusion )

請問　choice C 在削弱 conclusion 上有何錯誤呢
    ?

 

 

 

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-9-17 9:34:21编辑过]

swiss0204

再問一下~~~~

swiss0204

Ding ~~~~

mbz

C supports the conclusion. The problem is asking you to weaken it.

swiss0204

Thanks mbz,

腦筋轉了一下發現到的確是有support 作用~~~