ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2665|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

SOS!OG-73/OG-78/OG-79

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-10-14 03:34:00 | 只看该作者

SOS!OG-73/OG-78/OG-79

how about the official guide cr:73/78/79?
I really cannot understand the explanation.

tks in advance!
沙发
发表于 2003-10-15 04:56:00 | 只看该作者

The explanation

I got the wrong answer the first time I tried this question.


Acccording to the explanation in the questions. Three part exist in a hypnotized subject.
1. The part that heard the question.
2. The part that is deaf.
3. The part that is answering the question.

1 must associated with 3, otherwise the hypnotized subject will not anwer the question.  Then if the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies, how can the user answer "No?"

Why does the part that replies not answer, “Yes”? == Why does the part always replies answer, “No”?
Then the explanation in question is weakened.
板凳
发表于 2003-10-16 21:44:00 | 只看该作者
could you please paste the question here?
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2003-10-22 12:33:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢!
虽然我还是不够理解但是还继续努力着吧!

这几道题目都挺难的呢!

+U+U
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2003-10-22 12:37:00 | 只看该作者
回复了帖子之后,再看了老兄的解释,忽然有种茅塞顿开的感觉.

懂了呀!

GREAT!
TKS!
6#
发表于 2006-1-22 18:19:00 | 只看该作者

倒推:回答表明听见,根据EXPLANATION不同PART都是没有联系的,那么肯定不会是DEAF PART发出的指令,可是却回答NO(DEAF)

7#
发表于 2006-11-10 21:46:00 | 只看该作者
up
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-1-27 19:45
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部