求助 feifei-59 (解释也看不懂)

lichabrend

up

fishlibai

still confused,

why not C????

if today's employers donot rely on honors ranking in making their hiring decisions then the steps taken by the colleges to control grade inflation will not restore confidence in the degrees.

xiaoniuren

DING

daisyyulan

still confused,
why not C????
if today's employers donot rely on honors ranking in making their hiring decisions then the steps taken by the colleges to control grade inflation will not restore confidence in the degrees.

-- by 会员 fishlibai (2009/3/12 5:15:00)

同问~~

sunnylbs

To uibewsj    这种assumption的题  还是向lawyer说的  用取反  然后能weaken原文的 就是选项  （用来检查 也是很好的）  b取反 显然不能weaken

-- by 会员 eddienumb (2006/10/9 16:50:00)

弱弱的问一句：怎么取反啊？这道题我自己琢磨了好久，虽然好像明白了A为什么对，可还是搞不懂B到底错在哪了。。。

sdcar2010

(B) Awarding too many honors degrees causes colleges to inflate grades.

B is wrong because in the stimulus, it already said "Today, however, because of grade inflation, the honors degree goes to more than 50 percent of a graduating class." Therefore, grade inflation CAUSES too many honors; not too many honors causes grade inflation. However, reversing the premise won't weaken the argument. It just makes it more confusing.

sdcar2010

For this assumption, it is not necessarily a perfect case to use negation in order to find the answer since it is not asking for a necessary assumption in the first place. Simply shore up the argument in any way you can would do it.

Kris周强

Kris周强

LuckiPanda 发表于 2007-7-24 11:57
搭桥？hell，是排除其它原因。楼上是白痴

Mark一下！               

tu-yu

everann 发表于 2006-11-21 15:41
以下是引用michaelyun在2006-8-26 16:23:00的发言：这样的思路的确是GMAT的思路，但是我觉得这题其实有问题 ...

同意！