补充63的一个问题.

inlovesummer

2. It can be inferred from the passage that the “prevailling

  dogma” (line 10) held that

  (A) Jim Crow laws were passed to give legal status to

     well-established discriminatory practices in the

     South

  (B) Jim Crow laws were passed to establish order and

     uniformity in the discriminatory practices of

     different southern states.

  (C) Jim Crow laws were passed to erase the social gains

     that Black people had achieved since Reconstruction

  (D) the continuity of racial segregation in the South was

     disrupted by passage of Jim Crow laws

  (E) the Jim Crow laws of the late nineteenth and early

     twentieth centuries were passed to reverse the effect

     of earlier Jim Crow laws

答案是D,文章如下,我觉得我没有看到有讲到这一点的啊.请问是将WOOD的观点取非得到的吗?

Passage 39

      Historians sometimes forget that history is conunu-

   ally being made and experienced before it is studied,

   interpreted, and read. These latter activities have their

    own history, of course, which may impinge in unex-

(5)  pected ways on public events. It is difficult to predict

   when “new pasts” will overturn established historical

   interpretations and change the course of history.

     In the fall of 1954, for example, C. Vann Woodward

   delivered a lecture series at the University of Virginia

(10)
                    which challenged the prevailling dogma concerning the

   history, continuity, and uniformity of racial segregation

   in the South. He argued that the Jim Crow laws of the

   late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries not only

   codified traditional practice but also were a determined

(15)
                    effort to erase the considerable progress made by Black 

   people during and after Reconstruction in the 1870’s.

   This revisionist view of Jim Crow legislation grew in

   Part from the research that Woodward had done for the

   NAACP legal campaign during its preparation for

(20)
                    Brown v. Board of Education. The Supreme Court had

   issued its ruling in this epochal desegregation case a few

   months before Woodward’s lectures.

    The lectures were soon published as a book. The

    Strange Career of Jim Crow. Ten years later, in a

(25)
                           preface to the second revised edition. Woodward

   confessed with ironic modesty that the first edition

   “had begun to suffer under some of the handicaps that

   might be expected in a history of the American Revolu-

   tion published in 1776.” That was a bit like hearing

(30)Thomas Paine apologize for the timing of his pamphlet

   Common Sense, which had a comparable impact.

   Although Common Sense also had a mass readership.

   Paine had intended to reach and inspire: he was not a

   historian, and thus not concerned with accuracy or the

(35) dangers of historical anachronism. Yet, like Paine,

   Woodward had an unerring sense of the revolutionary

   moment, and of how historical evidence could under-

   mine the mythological tradition that was crushing the

   dreams of new social possibilities. Martin Luther King,

(40)
                    Jr.. testified to the profound effect of The Strange

   Career of Jim Crow on the civil rights movement by

   praising the book and quoting it frequently.

 

inlovesummer

不好意思,自己顶一个

charmant

应该是将他的观点取非

他认为那个法案的颁布把什么什么立为法典的同时，还忽略了黑人在革命中的作用（这是他认为该法案的消极影响）

全文看来他是反对那个法案的，那么传统观点应该是肯定该法案的积极作用的。

选一个夸奖那个法案的，D

该法案有效的打破了种族隔离制度

inlovesummer

嗯........谢了.