谁能告诉这几道题目得讨论连接 涛涛4套得逻辑讨论

mywaymydream

涛涛4

4－7

Q7:

Although the discount stores in Goreville’s central shopping district are expected to close within five years as a result of competition from a SpendLess discount department store that just opened, those locations will not stay vacant for long.  In the five years since the opening of Colson’s, a nondiscount department store, a new store has opened at the location of every store in the shopping district that closed because it could not compete with Colson’s.

 

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

 

1. Many customers of Colson’s are expected to do less shopping there than they did before the SpendLess store opened.
2. Increasingly, the stores that have opened in the central shopping district since Colson’s opened have been discount stores.
3. At present, the central shopping district has as many stores operating in it as it ever had.
4. Over the course of the next five years, it is expected that Goreville’s population will grow at a faster rate than it has for the past several decades.
5. Many stores in the central shopping district sell types of merchandise that are not available at either SpendLess or Colson’s.

mywaymydream

涛涛－4 Q11:

Because ethylene dibromide, a chemical used to fumigate grain, was blamed for the high rate of nerve damage suffered by people who work in grain-processing plants, many such plants switched to other chemical fumigants two years ago.  Since then, however, the percentage of workers at these plants who were newly diagnosed with nerve damage has not dropped significantly.  Therefore, either ethylene dibromide was wrongly blamed or else the new chemicals also cause nerve damage.

 

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

 

1. If the new chemicals cause nerve damage, the nerve damage caused would be different from any nerve damage that ethylene dibromide may cause.
2. There are no chemical fumigants that are completely safe for workers in grain-processing plants.
3. If ethylene dibromide causes nerve damage, it does not take two years or longer for that damage to become detectable.
4. Workers at grain-processing plants typically continue to work there even after being diagnosed with nerve damage.
5. Workers at grain-processing plants that still use ethylene dibromide continue to have a high rate of nerve damage.

mywaymydream

Q14:

Which of the flowing most logically completes the argument?

 

The attribution of the choral work Lacrimae to the composer Pescard (1400 – 1474) has been regarded as tentative, since it was based on a single treatise from the early 1500’s that named Pescard as the composer.  Recently, several musical treatises from the late 1500’s have come to light, all of which name Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae.  Unfortunately, these newly discovered treatises lend no support to the attribution of Lacrimae to Pescard, since _______.

 

1. the treatise from the early 1500’s misidentifies the composers of some of the musical works it considers
2. the author of the treatise from the early 1500’s had no very strong evidence on which to base the identification of Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae
3. there are works that can conclusively be attributed to Pescard that are not even mentioned in the treatise from the early 1500’s
4. the later treatises probably had no source for their attribution other than the earlier treatise
5. no known treatises from the 1600’s identify Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae

mywaymydream

Q21:

Editorial:  The roof of Northtown Council’s equipment-storage building collapsed under the weight of last week’s heavy snowfall.  The building was constructed recently and met local building-safety codes in every particular, except that the nails used for attaching roof supports to the building’s columns were of a smaller size than the codes specify for this purpose.  Clearly, this collapse exemplifies how even a single, apparently insignificant, departure from safety standards can have severe consequences.

 

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the editorial’s argument?

 

1. The only other buildings whose roofs collapsed from the weight of the snowfall were older buildings constructed according to less exacting standards than those in the safety codes.
2. Because of the particular location of the equipment-storage building, the weight of snow on its roof was greater than the maximum weight allowed for in the safety codes.
3. Because the equipment-storage building was not intended for human occupation, some safety-code provisions that would have applied to an office building did not apply to it.
4. The columns of the building were no stronger than the building-safety codes required for such a building.
5. Because the equipment-storage building was where the council kept snow-removal equipment, the building was almost completely empty when the roof collapsed.

cyang10

涛涛－4 Q11:

这是因为如果不像C选项所说的，ethylene dibromide应用后就会很快的发现nerve damage，那么换fumigant后， newly diagnose出来的damage就也有可能是因为换前ethylene造成的 就无法得出结论中ethylene为wrongly blamed的