[求助]TT GWD-11-30

chamcham

c

古韵

1.[原论点]

  i.工作的收入= meager income + 政府补贴
        ≤
        失业救济

 ii.不工作的收入=失业救济

 

è那还不如不工作呢？反正工不工作都最多拿到失业救济这么点钱；所以原文结论: no financial incentive

 

2. [Weaken]

  è方向：工作有financial incentive;

 

虽然现在看来，工不工作都是拿这么多；但从长远来看，只要你一踏上工作岗位，摆脱失业人员的帽子了，你今后再跳到别的工作，你的收入就会比压根没工作经验的人高，也即你新工作的salary会>失业救济。

 

所以，现在接受低收入工作，从长远来看还是有financial incentive的。

claudiaqt

我看了别的帖子还是不懂，看了你这个帖子就完全懂了，赞！！！谢谢啊。

a9141067s

那请问(E)    People sometimes accept jobs that pay relatively little simply because they enjoy the work.  ???

当初是想成  enjor the work 就是愿意接受低工资的 incentive

所以weaken了unemployed people will have no financial incentive to accept jobs that would entitle them to the supplement.

不知是那边想不对了

kaitlynyl

那请问(E)People sometimes accept jobs that pay relatively little simply because they enjoy the work.  ???
当初是想成  enjor the work 就是愿意接受低工资的 incentive
所以weaken了unemployed people will have no financial incentive to accept jobs that would entitle them to the supplement.
不知是那边想不对了

-- by 会员 a9141067s (2009/8/4 16:30:00)

我觉得是sometimes力度不够，题目是most seriously weaken 嘛~而且，和文章补助什么的扯远了，不沾边。