对话类的逻辑题，请指教？

1stzhang

请用这两个题目指点思路？谢谢
Student representative: Our university, in expelling a student who verbally harassed his roommate, has erred by penalizing the student for doing what he surely has a right to do: speak his mind!

Dean of students: but what you' re saying is that our university should endorse verbal harassment. Yet surely if we did that, we would threaten the free flow of ideas that is the essence of university life.

Which one of the following is a questionable technique that the dean of students uses in attempting to refute the student representative?

(A) challenging the student representative抯 knowledge of the process by which the student was expelled

(B) invoking a fallacious distinction between speech and other sorts of behavior

(C) misdescribing the student representative' s position, thereby making it easier to challenge

(D) questioning the motives of the student representative rather than offering reasons for the conclusion defended

(E) relying on a position of power to silence the opposing viewpoint with a threat



Historian: There is no direct evidence that timber was traded between the ancient nations of Poran and Nayal, but the fact that a law setting tariffs on timber imports from Poran was enacted during the third Nayalese dynasty does suggest that during that period a timber trade was co9nducted.

Critic: Your reasoning is flawed. During its third dynasty, Nayal may well have imported timber from Poran, but certainly on today's statute books there remain many laws regulating activities that were once common but in which people no longer engage.

21. The critic's response to the historian's reasoning does which one of the following?

(A) It implies an analogy between the present and the past.

(B) It identifies a general principle that the historian's reasoning violates.

(C) It distinguishes between what has been established as a certainty and what has been established as a possibility.

(D) It establishes explicit criteria that must be used in evaluating indirect evidence.

(E) It points out the dissimilar roles that law plays in societies that are distinct from one another.

cranberry

both answers are c,i feel.

cranberry

第一题：学生代表的话是，言论自由云云，而官方是针对，学校允许言语骚扰。代表要求不应处罚，官方曲解为应该支持。
第二题：学者认为存在法令代表必然存在被调整的行为，批评指出这只是一种可能。

我的一块砖头。

shany

1.同意cranberry.

2. 学者认为存在法令代表当时必然存在被调整的行为，而批评者以现在的法令作例子，来反驳说明未必存在这种行为。因此我认为是类比，答案A.

Bensontuo

1stzhang 发表于 2003-4-5 23:16
请用这两个题目指点思路？谢谢Student representative: Our university, in expelling a student who verba ...

Spot the question type: Method of the reasoning

Student representative's Conclusion

It is wrong to penalizing student who speak his mind

Dean of student's conclusion: If endorse the verbal harassment, free flow of ideas as the essence of university life is threatened.

1. Dean of student does not undermine the conclusion of the student representative; instead, dean of student falsely assume that by not penalizing the action fo speaking one's kind, it must be true that the verbal harassment is endorsed, and by that fallacious presumption, dean of the student concluded that it is sufficiently to lead to the necessary condition that the essence of university will be threatened.

Let us look into the answers. ]]

A. There is no any challenges regarding the knowledge of the process.

B. Dean of the student does not mention any other sorts of behavior.

C. It does misdescribing the position of student representative just to make it easier to challenge with.

D. Dean of the student does not question the motive of the student representative.

E. There is no any threat from Dean of the students.

Bensontuo

1stzhang 发表于 2003-4-5 23:16
请用这两个题目指点思路？谢谢Student representative: Our university, in expelling a student who verba ...

21

Spot the question type: Method of the reasoning

H's conclusion : Because the law of tariffs set, so the timber trade was conducted.

C's conclusion : Your conclusion is wrong, since a lot of laws that people no longer engage.

A shall be the correct answer.