ChaseDream
搜索
12
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: qingqinghu
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD25 36

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2006-12-21 20:05:00 | 只看该作者
12#
发表于 2006-12-22 09:01:00 | 只看该作者
ding
13#
发表于 2007-1-4 16:02:00 | 只看该作者
当大脑的cells被激活的时候,A就会被这些cells释放。当在醒着的时候被释放的总数慢慢增加的时候,A然后就会邦在越来越多的cells的位置上。而当睡着的时候邦着A的的地方变少了。一些研究人员就假设

A邦定大量的site的积累的过程的时候导致了睡觉的发生


注意cumulative这个词,他时候过程;当邦定积累到一定的程度,邦定就会慢慢减少,那么就会导致睡觉的刚刚开始
A 无关,因为提干中的假设是说睡觉刚刚开始的时候,而A说after long periods of sleep 

B  加强,说明A的邦定确实是和wakefullness或者是sleep相关的东西
C  br无关
D inactive无关
E 说stress导致wakefullness或者是sleep的东西,否认了是A的邦定导致wakefullness或者是sleep的东西,所以削弱

14#
发表于 2007-1-4 16:03:00 | 只看该作者
不过我有个问题的,B中咖啡因的对wakefullness作用似乎与提干中说的不一样啊~~
15#
发表于 2007-3-18 20:02:00 | 只看该作者
当邦定积累到一定的程度,邦定就会慢慢减少,那么就会导致睡觉的刚刚开始

不同意这样理解,实际上应该是当人处于清醒状态中-非睡眠状态中, A绑定大脑中的区域的数量一直在累积. 而当人睡眠时,绑定区域的数量就减少了. 科学家就猜想绑定积累到一定时候就会引发睡眠.  并不是绑定减少才引起睡眠,而是睡眠时A绑定数量开始下降.

B说咖啡因干扰了A的绑定过程,也就是说咖啡因打乱了A的绑定, 使A的绑定数量无法增多, 从而让人保持清醒.

16#
发表于 2007-5-2 20:49:00 | 只看该作者

我这样理解

"as the total amount released gradually increases during wakefulness", 是说醒的时候释放的A增加,

"during sleepness, the nuber of sites to which a is bound decreases"是说睡的时候A可以bind的site减少。

A的释放增加,和site减少,是两回事。所谓site减少就是A物质bind to site减少,这个是在睡眠时发生的。所以科学家的假说是认为睡眠时bind这件事减少。

B就是说抑止bind这件事,刚好针对问题关键。


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-5-2 20:49:55编辑过]
17#
发表于 2009-9-2 14:18:00 | 只看该作者
18#
发表于 2010-3-13 12:21:22 | 只看该作者
大家可以看看这篇OG里面的阅读,作为一个背景知识,应该就容易理解这个逻辑题目了。
把OG关于咖啡因的文章贴到此,供大家参考。

Caffeine, the stimulant in coffee, has been called
“the most widely used psychoactive substance on Earth .”
Synder, Daly and Bruns have recently proposed that
caffeine affects behavior by countering the activity in
(5) the human brain of a naturally occurring chemical called
adenosine. Adenosine normally depresses neuron firing
in many areas of the brain. It apparently does this by
inhibiting the release of neurotransmitters, chemicals
that carry nerve impulses from one neuron to the next.
(10) Like many other agents that affect neuron firing,
adenosine must first bind to specific receptors on
neuronal membranes. There are at least two classes
of these receptors, which have been designated A1 and
A2. Snyder et al propose that caffeine, which is struc-
(15) turally similar to adenosine, is able to bind to both types
of receptors, which prevents adenosine from attaching
there and allows the neurons to fire more readily than
they otherwise would.
For many years, caffeine’s effects have been attri-
(20) buted to its inhibition of the production of phosphodi-
esterase, an enzyme that breaks down the chemical
called cyclic AMP.A number of neurotransmitters exert
their effects by first increasing cyclic AMP concentra-
tions in target neurons. Therefore, prolonged periods at
(25) the elevated concentrations, as might be brought about
by a phosphodiesterase inhibitor, could lead to a greater
amount of neuron firing and, consequently, to behav-
ioral stimulation. But Snyder et al point out that the
caffeine concentrations needed to inhibit the production
(30) of phosphodiesterase in the brain are much higher than
those that produce stimulation. Moreover, other com-
pounds that block phosphodiesterase’s activity are not
stimulants.
To buttress their case that caffeine acts instead by pre-
(35) venting adenosine binding, Snyder et al compared the
stimulatory effects of a series of caffeine derivatives with
their ability to dislodge adenosine from its receptors in
the brains of mice. “In general,” they reported, “the
ability of the compounds to compete at the receptors
(40) correlates with their ability to stimulate locomotion in
the mouse; i.e., the higher their capacity to bind at the
receptors, the higher their ability to stimulate locomo-
tion.” Theophylline, a close structural relative of caffeine
and the major stimulant in tea, was one of the most
(45) effective compounds in both regards.
There were some apparent exceptions to the general
correlation observed between adenosine-receptor binding
and stimulation. One of these was a compound called
3-isobuty1-1-methylxanthine(IBMX), which bound very
(50) well but actually depressed mouse locomotion. Snyder
et al suggest that this is not a major stumbling block to
their hypothesis. The problem is that the compound has
mixed effects in the brain, a not unusual occurrence with
psychoactive drugs. Even caffeine, which is generally
(55) known only for its stimulatory effects, displays this
property, depressing mouse locomotion at very low
concentrations and stimulating it at higher ones.
19#
发表于 2010-3-13 12:31:50 | 只看该作者
The chemical adenosine is released by brain cells when those cells are active.
Adenosine then binds to more and more sites on cells in certain areas of thebrain, as the total amount released gradually increases during wakefulness.  随着化学物质Adenosine被脑细胞释放出来的数量在清醒时的逐步增加,A物质越来越多地绑定到大脑的某一区域(注意,这里的意思可不是说“绑定的多就清醒”如果错误理解成这样,那就会觉得前后有矛盾,而是“醒着的时候大脑释放A,A逐步越来越多地绑定”)

During sleep, the number of sites to which adenosine is bound decreases. 睡眠时,A物质被绑定的区域减少(我的理解是和前面那句话说的是一回事,A绑定的越来越多,所以可以给更多的A用来绑定的区域当然就少了)

Some  researchers have hypothesized that it is the cumulative binding of adenosine to a
large number of sites that causes the onset of sleep.
结论:累计的A绑定到大脑某个区域的数量达到一个大的量,这个累积的绑定就引发了睡眠。
注意:THAT从句 that causes the onset of sleep修饰限定的是binding

所以这个题目B的含义和结论要论证的方向完全一致。

其实还是阅读理解的问题,我一开始也晕。
20#
发表于 2010-10-1 22:37:56 | 只看该作者
顶楼上,解释的非常清楚
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-6 07:46
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部