求教：两道GMAT逻辑

minivicki

1.
In several cities, the government is going ahead with ambitious construction p
rojects despite the high office vacancy rates in those cities. The vacant offi
ces, though available for leasing, unfortunately do not meet the requirements
for the facilities needed, such as court houses and laboratories. The governme
nt, therefore, is not guilty of any fiscal wastefulness.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?


A.  Adaptation of vacant office space to meet the government’s requirements,
if possible, would not make leasing such office space a more cost effective al
ternative to new construction.
B.  If facilities available for leasing come very close to meeting the governm
ent’s requirements for facilities the government needs, the government can re
lax its own requirements slightly and consider those facilities in compliance.

题目的意思是理解的，但是下面的两个选项的意思不是很懂，特别是那个in compliance是
什么意思呢？


2.
Professor A:  We must make a strong moral statement against Country X’s polic
ies. Only total divestment—the sale of all stock in companies that have facto
ries or business offices in X—can do this. Therefore, the university should d
ivest totally.

Which of the following, if true, would be evidence that the university would n
ot be harmed economically if it followed Professor A’s recommendation.

答案是：The expected financial return to the university form stocks that the u
niversity could own under a policy of total divestment is approximately the sa
me as the expected financial return form the same as the expected financial.

不理解这句话的意思，特别是最后的“the expected financial” 是指什么呢？

望达人指教。多谢

wycg

1.  in compliance 是同意,依从, 顺从的意思. AB里面同意选B.

2. 最后的“the expected financial”应该是指在current policy下的return. 个人理解,BTW,我觉得楼主好象是敲的不对呀.

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-6-15 20:29:23编辑过]

hawkinsxie

1. 选A啊！

2. 题目不对，没法解释。

mbz

1, B is right, A would have been right if the not was deleted.

2. type it again

hawkinsxie

以下是引用mbz在2006-6-15 22:54:00的发言：

1, B is right, A would have been right if the not was deleted.

2. type it again

No! No! No!

A is the best answer!

原文：不达标准---〉要建新的不要租

A 说即使改变也不能有利于租。取反，改变就能租，不用新建，原文不成立。

B 说如果可改，就降低要求。取反，能改也不降低要求，还是要建新的，原文成立。

问Assumption啊！

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-6-16 9:59:45编辑过]

hawkinsxie

up

gonghao

1.选b，联系了因和果.A只提到了因，没有提到果

2.Which of the following, if true, would be evidence that the university would n
ot be harmed economically if it followed Professor A’s recommendation.

答案是：The expected financial return to the university form stocks that the u
niversity could own under a policy of total divestment is approximately the sa
me as the expected financial return form the same as the expected financial.

不理解这句话的意思，特别是最后的“the expected financial” 是指什么呢？

这里得问题是would not be harmed economically 所以应该找个和其相关得

这里依照Professor A’s 的意思就得狠狠剥夺股票方能反应队X国家政策的反对。

答案应该是，剥夺股票且还能维持finance的东西。

选项就是说：大学在剥夺允许的范围内所持有的股票所能产生的financial return能满足其预期财政收入
这样就不会伤害到大学的经济利益

hawkinsxie

大全GMAT-Test20-5: A