ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: fiaoyaya
打印 上一主题 下一主题

fiaoyaya突破逻辑瓶颈

[精华] [复制链接]
21#
发表于 2006-6-4 23:41:00 | 只看该作者
速度问题的根本是阅读。所以还是从阅读上多提高
22#
发表于 2006-6-7 12:56:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用fiaoyaya在2006-6-4 19:22:00的发言:
FF已做完,但是太遗憾了,一个section都要超过30分钟.基本在40分钟左右,觉得根本快不起来.而且偶一快就乱

同志啊,看来要好好练练阅读啊...

练过"杨鹏难句"么?

23#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-6-15 22:57:00 | 只看该作者

末有练过杨鹏啊~~~不过阅读错得挺少的啊~~速度也挺快~~不知道为虾米逻辑总要想一想才能做对

大家帮偶看看这2道题目的思路是虾米样子的?

On the basis of figures it complies, a citizens’ group argues that congressional members of party X authorize the spending of more taxpayer dollars than do congressional members of Party Y. The group’s figures are based on an analysis of the number of spending bills for which members of Congress vote.

 

The figures of the citizens’ group will be unreliable as a gauge of which party in Congress spends more taxpayer dollars if which of the following is true?

 

A) the group weighs all votes for spending bills equally, no matter how much taxpayer money is involved in each bill.

B) The group counts votes for all spending bills, including bills concerning the salaries of members of congress.

C) Most spending bills that members of Party X vote for are passed by Congress.

D) Most spending bills that members of Party X vote for are written and sponsored by members of Party X.

E) All spending bills, before being voted on by Congress, must be approved by committees in which members of both parties participate.

How does a building contractor most readily prove compliance with the building codes governing new construction? By using those established technologies that the authors of the codes had in mind when setting specifications. This, unfortunately, means that there will never be any significant technological innovation within the industry.

 

Which of the following, if true, casts the most serious doubt on the conclusion above?

 

A) Among the authors of codes governing new construction are people who were formerly building contractors.

B) The authors of codes governing new construction are under pressure to set rigorous specifications.

C) What are now regarded as established technologies were once so innovative that the authors of the codes then applicable could not have foreseen them.

D) Noncompliance with the codes governing new construction can prove extremely costly to the building contractor in charge of the project.

E) The established technologies of one country’s building industry can be very different from those of another’s.

 

 

 

24#
发表于 2006-6-15 23:31:00 | 只看该作者
D, C.
25#
发表于 2006-6-15 23:36:00 | 只看该作者

第一题事实上是解释题,解释不能作为标准的原因。不需要充分性,只要解释差异。D表示X政党的政治资金有其特殊性,正确。其他都是无关项。

第二题削弱,而且是削弱方式中的直接攻击结论,原文结论是法令限制了新技术,C表示历史上法令并没有限制新技术,正确。

26#
发表于 2006-6-15 23:42:00 | 只看该作者

顺便说一下,你的方法总结很好。

我的意见是,根据lawyer_1的分类方法固然好,但更重要的是自己吃透。

OG那么多题目,其实无论什么题型,充其量就几种解题思路。关键是"thinking of the reasoning while reading, practice in that way as fast as possible."

27#
发表于 2006-6-15 23:51:00 | 只看该作者

另外说一下怎么做题,其实在掌握大量解题思路后,做题步骤才是关键。

1)读原文,理清逻辑思路,有没有明显的逻辑错误,逻辑关系的推理是不是convincing

2)读题干,其实先读题干还是先读原文,没有定论。快速闪过,该题型的解题要领。

3)读选项,快速排除明显错误的,大多为无关项。

4)同时,对拿不准的,记住选项号,并继续往下读。

5)原则上,五选二,在两个拿不定主意的时候,根据经验判断。

6)对那些,所有选项都快速排除的题目,时间允许的话,重读原文;否则根据感觉选。

7) 什么是经验,什么是感觉,多做GWD的题,少做LSAT的题,你就知道什么是感觉了。

一家之言,欢迎批判。

28#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-6-16 00:14:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用hawkinsxie在2006-6-15 23:31:00的发言:
D, C.
第一题的答案是A啊~~
这两题偶都末有思路
29#
发表于 2006-6-16 03:34:00 | 只看该作者

A is right , please pay attention to the changes of the bold faced words below to get the feel.

--The group argues that congressional members of party X authorize the spending of more taxpayer dollars than do congressional members of Party

--based on an analysis of the number of spending bills for which members of Congress vote

-- A) the group weighs all votes for spending bills equally, no matter how much taxpayer money is involved in each bill.

30#
发表于 2006-6-16 07:39:00 | 只看该作者

oh, after scrutinizing the question again, I agree that A is the best answer.

仍然是解释差异,但不是解释X和Y的差异,而是解释figure和gauge的差异。题目没看清。


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-6-16 7:56:35编辑过]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-18 07:38
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部