ChaseDream
搜索
12
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: 谢沁薇
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD21-7 似乎没人问过

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2007-7-5 01:38:00 | 只看该作者
up
12#
发表于 2007-11-28 22:21:00 | 只看该作者

C确实正确。但是如C所言,owner of capital 没有拿到相应比例的income, 那么worker岂不是拿到了高于其相应贡献比例的income? 这样E选项岂不是也正确了?那位牛牛说说。这可是本月jj题。

难道因为E中的the value of their labor不等于their contribution to total output。

13#
发表于 2007-12-9 17:47:00 | 只看该作者
E错哪里?E虽然和现实有差距,但加上劳动价值论的假设还是符合作者本意的。其他选项未必有这么好吧?
14#
发表于 2008-8-4 15:26:00 | 只看该作者
up
15#
发表于 2009-7-19 20:36:00 | 只看该作者

同问~~~ 为什么E不对~~~

文章不就是说capital被低估了,labor被高估了吗?

请求NN解答

16#
发表于 2009-8-4 22:36:00 | 只看该作者
/
17#
发表于 2010-2-4 12:37:22 | 只看该作者
同问。E为什么不对?
18#
发表于 2010-5-5 16:38:26 | 只看该作者
Let me try to explain.

The argument talks about "contribution (to the total output)" and "income (raised from the total output)".
contribution - 1/3 from capital goods, implies that 2/3 from worker labor
income - 2/3 to wages of workers, 1/3 to the shareholder etc.

From the above, we may conclude that C is correct.

Option E, it sounds correct at first glance. Nevertheless, it mentions that "Workers receive a share of this income that is greater than the value of their labor", which means this sentence claims that "income" is greater than "value of their labor". We cannot draw such a conclusion from the context because the author doesn't imply that the income raised from total output is well worth of the money.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-25 21:15
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部