ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1701|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG10-25

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-5-29 22:12:00 | 只看该作者

OG10-25

 第九篇

In an attempt to improve the overall performance of clerical workersmany companies have introduced computerized performance monitoring and control systems(CPMCS)that record and report a worker's computer-driven activitiesHowever, at least one study has shown that such monitoring may not be having the desired effectIn the study, researchers asked monitored clerical workers and their supervisors how assessments of productivity affected supervisors ratings of worker’s performance. In contrast to unmonitored workers doing the same workwho without exception identified the most important element in their jobs as customer service, the monitored workers and their supervisors all responded that productivity was the critical factor in assigning ratingsThis finding suggested that there should have been a strong correlation between a monitored worker's productivity and the overall rating the worker received. However, measures of the relationship between overall rating and individual elements of performance clearly supported the conclusion that supervisors gave considerable weight to criteria such as attendance, accuracy, and indications of customer satisfaction. It is possible that productivity may be a hygiene factor"that isif it is too lowit will hurt the overall ratingBut the evidence suggests that beyond the point at which productivity becomes good enough"higher productivity per se is unlikely to improve a rating.


Questions 47-51 refer to the passage a hove.

47  According to the passagebefore the final results of the study were knownwhich of the following seemed likely?

(A)  That workers with the highest productivity would also be the most accurate

(B)  That workers who initially achieved high productivity ratings would continue to do so consistently

(C)  That the highest performance ratings would be achieved by workers with the highest productivity

(D)  That the most productive workers would be those whose supervisors claimed to value productivity

(E)  That supervisors who claimed to value productivity would place equal value on customer satisfaction


48
  It can be inferred that the author of the passage discussesunmonitored workers(1ine 12)primarily in order to

(A)  compare the ratings of these workers with the ratings of monitored workers

(B)  provide an example or a case in which monitoring might be effective

(C)  provide evidence of an inappropriate use of CPMCS

(D)  emphasize the effect that CPMCS may have on workers’ perceptions of their jobs

(E)  illustrate the effect that CPMCS may have on workers’ ratings 


49
Which of the following, if true, would most clearly have supported the conclusion referred to in lines 23-25?

(A)  Ratings of productivity correlated highly with ratings of both accuracy and attendance

(B)  Electronic monitoring greatly increased productivity

(C)  Most supervisors based overall ratings of performance on measures of productivity alone

(D)  Overall ratings of performance correlated more highly with measures of productivity than the researchers expected

(E)  Overall ratings of performance correlated more highly with measures Of accuracy than with measures of productivity


50
  According to the passagea hygiene factor"(1ine27)is an aspect of a worker's performance that

(A)  has no effect on the rating of a worker's performance

(B)  is so basic to performance that it is assumed to be adequate for all workers

(C)  is given less importance than it deserves in rating a worker's performance

(D)  is not likely to affect a worker's rating unless it is judged to be inadequate

(E)  is important primarily because of the effect it has on a worker's rating


51
The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A)  explain the need for the Introduction of an innovative strategy

(B)  discuss a study of the use of a particular method

(C)  recommend a course of action

(D)  resolve a difference of opinion

(E)  suggest an alternative approach

 

 

 

第九篇的问题共2个问题,

1文中6行后面的however后面的那句是主题句吗?However, at least one study has shown that such monitoring may not be having the desired effect

是不是只要文章第一段第二句是以however起头,这第二句就是主题句?

 

 

 

251题的选项A的意思不明白,和OG解释有点疑问

51 The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A)  explain the need for the Introduction of an innovative strategy

解释一个革命性政策引进的必要性,如果文章是不必要的,是不是就得写成解释一个革命性政策引进的必要性,可能我表达的不太准确,我就想知道need这个词是不是只有必要性的意思,我觉得本文作者是倾向于这个系统没有什么用,我这样想对吗?如果这句改成解释一个革命性政策引进的不必要性的话是不是就对了?

A选项的OG解释:The passage reports rather than argues; it does not explain the need for a strategy.

我的问题是The passage reports rather than argues;这什么OG会这样解释,我看A选项只有解释这个词,从哪里看出A选项有argues的意思在呢?


沙发
发表于 2006-5-30 00:34:00 | 只看该作者

小蚂蚁这篇的问题好少喔

 

 

 

第九篇的问题共2个问题,
            

1文中6行后面的however后面的那句是主题句吗?However, at least one study has shown that such monitoring may not be having the desired effect


    

 

是不是只要文章第一段第二句是以however起头,这第二句就是主题句?
            

 其实要看文章的走向喔, 第一段有however 的通常是表态度转折, 很大的机会however 后面才是文章或作者的真正态度, 所以很有可能. 但是也不能太极端的说一定就是吧

 其实要看文章的走向喔, 第一段有however 的通常是表态度转折, 很大的机会however 后面才是文章或作者的真正态度, 所以很有可能. 但是也不能太极端的说一定就是吧

 

251题的选项A的意思不明白,和OG解释有点疑问

51 The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A)  explain the need for the Introduction of an innovative strategy

解释一个革命性政策引进的必要性,如果文章是不必要的,是不是就得写成解释一个革命性政策引进的必要性,可能我表达的不太准确,我就想知道need这个词是不是只有必要性的意思,我觉得本文作者是倾向于这个系统没有什么用,我这样想对吗?如果这句改成解释一个革命性政策引进的不必要性的话是不是就对了?
            

其实这篇文章很重要一点是作者主观态度非常不明确. 整篇文章像一篇新闻报导, 你找不出作者用第一人称作出的叙述. 算是一个非常客观的叙述, 就算有主观态度也是非常保守的. 所以要改也不能说不必要性, 也只能说释一个革命性政策 might be flawed.  (clue: at least one study has shown that such monitoring may not be having the desired effect. 如果是不必要性作者可能会用 many studies, 而不是 at least one study)

 

A选项的OG解释:The passage reports rather than argues; it does not explain the need for a strategy.

我的问题是The passage reports rather than argues;这什么OG会这样解释,我看A选项只有解释这个词,从哪里看出A选项有argues的意思在呢?

 

其实这就牵扯到主客观的问题了, argue 有提出自己主观意见的意思. 解释一个事情的必要性是非常主观的. 所以错.

 

 

板凳
发表于 2006-5-30 01:11:00 | 只看该作者

251题的选项A的意思不明白,和OG解释有点疑问

51 The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A)  explain the need for the Introduction of an innovative strategy

解释一个革命性政策引进的必要性,如果文章是不必要的,是不是就得写成解释一个革命性政策引进的必要性,可能我表达的不太准确,我就想知道need这个词是不是只有必要性的意思,我觉得本文作者是倾向于这个系统没有什么用,我这样想对吗?如果这句改成解释一个革命性政策引进的不必要性的话是不是就对了?
            

你的思路有点乱,别这么研究文章。我也做错了,文章确实是强调这个方法有问题,因为一开始说目的是:OVER ALL,结果雇员全部去关心 效率了。   It is possible that productivity may be a hygiene factor"that isif it is too lowit will hurt the overall ratingBut the evidence suggests that beyond the point at which productivity becomes good enough"higher productivity per se is unlikely to improve a rating.  作者意思挺明确的,是对方法的负态度。但是,仅仅是REPORTS ,就像你说一个手机质量不好,和你想的有偏差,然后写了篇文章说怎么的辜负你的希望了。你不是说要NOKIA 去造一个新的,你只是发泄一下,REPORT 一下。

一起研究

你的思路有点乱,别这么研究文章。我也做错了,文章确实是强调这个方法有问题,因为一开始说目的是:OVER ALL,结果雇员全部去关心 效率了。   It is possible that productivity may be a hygiene factor"that isif it is too lowit will hurt the overall ratingBut the evidence suggests that beyond the point at which productivity becomes good enough"higher productivity per se is unlikely to improve a rating.  作者意思挺明确的,是对方法的负态度。但是,仅仅是REPORTS ,就像你说一个手机质量不好,和你想的有偏差,然后写了篇文章说怎么的辜负你的希望了。你不是说要NOKIA 去造一个新的,你只是发泄一下,REPORT 一下。

一起研究

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2006-5-30 08:22:00 | 只看该作者

sen4sun:

其实这篇文章很重要一点是作者主观态度非常不明确. 整篇文章像一篇新闻报导, 你找不出作者用第一人称作出的叙述. 算是一个非常客观的叙述, 就算有主观态度也是非常保守的. 所以要改也不能说不必要性, 也只能说释一个革命性政策 might be flawed.  (clue: at least one study has shown that such monitoring may not be having the desired effect. 如果是不必要性作者可能会用 many studies, 而不是 at least one study)

这个解释超有说服力的!!!!!

allen0018:(要谢谢你的解答先)

你的思路有点乱,别这么研究文章。我也做错了,文章确实是强调这个方法有问题,因为一开始说目的是:OVER ALL,结果雇员全部去关心 效率了。   It is possible that productivity may be a hygiene factor"that isif it is too lowit will hurt the overall ratingBut the evidence suggests that beyond the point at which productivity becomes good enough"higher productivity per se is unlikely to improve a rating.  作者意思挺明确的,是对方法的负态度。但是,仅仅是REPORTS ,就像你说一个手机质量不好,和你想的有偏差,然后写了篇文章说怎么的辜负你的希望了。你不是说要NOKIA 去造一个新的,你只是发泄一下,REPORT 一下。

有点疑问,allen0018:你既然说文章确实是强调这个方法有问题,,作者意思挺明确的,是对方法的负态度。为什么又说但是,仅仅是REPORTS???? ,我觉得你的解释有点自相矛盾呢,前面的sen4sun的解释我觉得挺对的。

可不要生气啊,我就是很认真的看了你的解答我才有这个疑惑呢,

 等你一起探讨。

5#
发表于 2016-4-15 14:19:01 | 只看该作者
关于50题也有疑惑,请问谁可以解释一下吗?unless it is judged to be inadequate特别是这个要怎么理解呢
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-3 05:47
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部