2006年10月队备考交流基地

madben

以下是引用redhot99在2006-10-2 19:09:00的发言：

楼上大哥复习挺充实的，呵呵。想请问队长和其他同仁，考试的时候真的很难的数学题多么，我现在也不指望51了，保住50就可以了，太粗心了。想听听大家意见。thx

我觉得真正难的数学题就那么一两道。其它的题目主要是要细心。
细心细心再细心是拿数学50或51分的关键。另外在确认答案之前，再回头看一看题目中的条件有没有漏的，我在实战的时候有両三道是要确认时才更正的答案。
我做题中发现自己容易忽略的条件有：

• 是否可以为0
• 是否指出両数不相等（両直线不同等等）
• 是否指明是整数还是实数
• 是否指明正负

你可以将自己做错的数学题做一个总结，看自己容易在哪些方面犯迷糊，实战时在这些方面就特别仔细奌。

madben

以下是引用fantasy06在2006-10-3 3:33:00的发言：

我用pp3测了数学，（没敢用GMATprep,据说prep比机考还难）居然有48分，而且没有超时，大家会觉得很菜，可是这比我预料的好多了。

下一步继续完成OG11 Math 的PS最后100题和DS全部。12号以后开始jj

另外大家有人做过FF数学的第七部分吗，据说是较难jj题，对我这样数学很差的人，做FF有用吗？

你的数学其实不错啊，我觉得在JJ的基础上，可以保50争51。加油！

lexie

Press Secretary: Our critics claim that the President’s recent highway project cancellations demonstrate a vindictive desire to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties. They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts. But all of the canceled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors. So the President’s choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the press secretary’s argument depends?

1. Canceling highway projects was not the only way for the President to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.
           
2. The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in the report were not mostly projects in districts controlled by the President’s party.
           
3. The number of projects canceled was a significant proportion of all the highway projects that were to be undertaken by the government in the near future.
           
4. The highway projects canceled in districts controlled by the President’s party were not generally more expensive than the projects canceled in districts controlled by opposition parties.
           
5. Reports by nonpartisan auditors are not generally regarded by the opposition parties as a source of objective assessments of government projects.

答案是B。这句话的结论是最后一句吧 那么假设支持结论应该是从最后一句话来入手把 而且这篇文章是前提结论型的文章 那么就是直接加强结论就okay, 没有理解B是怎么strengthen的 请教请教

开始觉得选D, 后来发现去掉D中的not 剩下的部分实际上是加强 然后+上D就变成了weaken所以不对

请问这样的思路是不是有问题呢？

fantasy06

谢谢MaccMichAA和队长的鼓励，我会继续努力。

看了Nolayang前几天的帖子，好生佩服呀！60道SC，才做错5--6道。

我OG做了两遍还看了错题的解释（看解释及其耗费时间），可做大全中的86版OG和最后三套新题（新题15+新题一套+天山20）还是错得一塌糊涂。比来比去要么看不出选项的差异，要么觉得每题都有毛病或是至少两个选项都对。我还有个致命的问题就是通常连错几道。

只有20多天了，怎么办呢？我是继续大全，还是改看白勇，或是直接GWD算了？恳请大家出出主意。

fantasy06

 I don't analyse the type of the stimulus.  I just think that:

Critics conclude that: the President’s recent highway project cancellations demonstrate a vindictive desire to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.

Critics' Evidence: 90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts--ie.legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.

Press secretary's Conclustion(counterargument): So the President’s choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics.

Press secretary's evidence: But all of the canceled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors.

Logic gap between: all of the canceled projects in nonpartisan report were wasteful --- 90 percent of the projects canceled were in districts controlled by opposition parties, so Secretary assumeed that the wateful projects were mainly in districts contrlled by opposition parties, i.e. B,The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in the report were not mostly projects in districts controlled by the President’s party.
        

D is out of scope. I think expensive doesn't mean wasteful necessarily, what's more,  D seems not to be related to the secretary's reasoning.

The above is just my personal opinion.  Please let me know if I am wrong.

redhot99

谢谢队长指导

madben

以下是引用fantasy06在2006-10-4 3:00:00的发言：

谢谢MaccMichAA和队长的鼓励，我会继续努力。

看了Nolayang前几天的帖子，好生佩服呀！60道SC，才做错5--6道。

我OG做了两遍还看了错题的解释（看解释及其耗费时间），可做大全中的86版OG和最后三套新题（新题15+新题一套+天山20）还是错得一塌糊涂。比来比去要么看不出选项的差异，要么觉得每题都有毛病或是至少两个选项都对。我还有个致命的问题就是通常连错几道。

只有20多天了，怎么办呢？我是继续大全，还是改看白勇，或是直接GWD算了？恳请大家出出主意。

做GWD和分类总结吧, GWD的材料很好，我用了两个星期, 因为时间不够没能做分类总结。

fantasy06

多谢队长。我得赶紧了，要尽快开始GWD，先模考用，然后再看分类总结

icecream_mba

以下是引用fantasy06在2006-10-4 13:28:00的发言：

多谢队长。我得赶紧了，要尽快开始GWD，先模考用，然后再看分类总结

Add oil.... ur explanation for the CR question is pretty to the point !!! No problem for the GWD questions !!!

icecream_mba

I continue to review the GWD questions that i did before... just realise that i did some GWD questions before... now i finished 14 set of GWD questions... haha.. but my correctness is pretty low... should add oil to review all the questions... i found that reviewing the old questions (OG+GWD) are more important than doing new questions... i better to master the old ones before starting the new questions... now i redo all the GWD SC questions whenever i have to get the feel of the SC... i still feel that during the actual test..  i  only have the feel remaining to make my ans. correct !!!