2006年10月队备考交流基地

madben

6/24

做完了第二遍中做错的语法题，又看了一遍这些题目的解释。

我传上来一个我正在进行的语法总结文档，希望能得到队友们的反馈和建议。(Upload failed. I will try it tomorrow.)

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-6-26 13:36:57编辑过]

Nolayang

JB denied a motion to allow members of the jury to go home at the end of each day rather than to be confined to a hotel

I think we can't say 'allow ...be confined',seems awkward.

There isn't a 'to' in the original choice.

Nolayang

25th.Jun

SC 75% 20Q

1.not should be followed by a verb

2.rights and obligations&distribution and consumption of resources&spend beyond its means%genetic mutations

2.excepting is used in a negative construction

3.can potentially   --->redundant,ambious

4.dont't use passive -vioce when it's unnecessary!

RC 100% 21

CR 100% 15

虽然全对,但都是做过的题目,答案没看完就选出来了

木有成就感...

Nolayang

一个句子不明白...

Chinese,the most ancient of living writing systems,consists fo tens of thousands of ideographic characters,each character a miniature calligraphic composition inside its own square frame.

character here must be a verb,but what's the phrase mean?

madben

以下是引用Nolayang在2006-6-25 18:15:00的发言：

JB denied a motion to allow members of the jury to go home at the end of each day rather than to be confined to a hotel

I think we can't say 'allow ...be confined',seems awkward.

There isn't a 'to' in the original choice.

I don't mean that there is "to" in the original choice. It could be omitted in the following structure.

to X, [to] Y, and [to] Z

这个句子我觉得应该这样理解：

1. Members of the jury are confined to a hotel at the end of each day.
2. There was motion to allow members to go home at the end of each day.
3. Judge denied that motion.

allow somebody to do X rather than to do Y的结构里，to do Y不是allow的对象，它只是和to do X建立一种逻辑上的对立关系。换句话说，to do Y 是不需要被allow的，但是not to do Y是需要的。因为在本结构里，to do Y是被否定的，也就是说从逻辑上讲是allow somebody to not do Y。

所以，在这种情况，不应该简单地将to do X rather than 去掉然后考虑allow to do Y是不是合理。

madben

6/25

今天做了一套GMATPrep的模考题，考的分数让我有点惊讶：

Q: 50 (5 incorrect)
V: 41 (9 incorrect)
Score: 760

数学提前了半个多小时，如果用草稿纸，可能会少错两道题。但同时有3道题我不太能够理解它给出的答案。我会发到相应的数学区里。 http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=22&id=178798

语法总觉得时间不够，结果却提前了５分钟，估计是因为４篇阅读出现比较早的缘故。第一道题就是OG上的逻辑，后来还碰到了一道做过的语法和逻辑，不过后一道逻辑做错了。语法错的题有６道语法，２道逻辑，１道阅读。语法虽然花的时间最多，却见效最少。

我知道我现在的水平还考不出这样的分数，而且我也看到很多牛人在模考时分数不高，同时有很多模考分数不错的人最后得分不高。所以这种模考的分数并不能说明什么。但是这次考试肯定了我下一阶段的复习重点：语法！

我计划在下个月主攻语法，同时隔天做做阅读和逻辑。

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-6-26 13:34:42编辑过]

Nolayang

1. Members of the jury are confined to a hotel at the end of each day.
2. There was motion to allow members to go home at the end of each day.
3. Judge denied that motion.
allow somebody to do X rather than to do Y的结构里，to do Y不是allow的对象，它只是和to do X建立一种逻辑上的对立关系。换句话说，to do Y 是不需要被allow的，但是not to do Y是需要的。因为在本结构里，to do Y是被否定的，也就是说从逻辑上讲是allow somebody to not do Y。

如果to do Y 是被否定的

那这个motion是不是应该就是 allow members to go home at the end of each day rather than be confined to the hotel

要不deny否定的motion就不包括 be confined to the hotel

大概意思偶明白了~ 

Nolayang

看到队长的语法总结了

汗...应该花了很多时间吧....要我做得要一下午,还把以前的零散的语发点集中起来...

这个这个...花这个时间值得么...

小小的质疑以下

Nolayang

26th.Jun

SC  75% 20

many parallellism constructures confuse me...

CR 95% 15

one word is omitted in the question,is't not my fault

RC 72% 25

I have done all the questions before,still chose the same incorrect answers.I'll exam them tomorrow cos I'm tied now...

 

madben

以下是引用Nolayang在2006-6-26 17:27:00的发言：

看到队长的语法总结了

汗...应该花了很多时间吧....要我做得要一下午,还把以前的零散的语发点集中起来...

这个这个...花这个时间值得么...

小小的质疑以下

It took me way more than one afternoon. Is it worthy? I don't know. (Probably not because I haven't seen any obvious progress in SC area.) I intended to make it as a one-stop document that I can use to review all SC related stuff, but it is far from complete yet.