ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: rheazhang
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[梦之队日记] 2006年8月队请进!欢迎大家来讨论

[精华] [复制链接]
381#
发表于 2006-7-11 10:06:00 | 只看该作者

那题链接的解释很牵强。。。我觉得我的解释是最合理的,如果veterinarian是兽医的意思能被准确的翻译的话。。。呵呵

382#
发表于 2006-7-11 10:25:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用顾风在2006-7-11 10:02:00的发言:

veterinarians 是兽医的意思。

我觉得此题是这样的,因为farmers不去汇报,所以 diseased cattle被治好或者症状缓解的可能性就非常小了。因为farmers对病牛的不做为,导致牛死多了,而不是病毒的毒性上去了。

队长把5楼的帖子解释得更清楚了。个人看来两个意见不冲突。

队长也在做lsat吗?

383#
发表于 2006-7-11 10:29:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用biss33在2006-7-11 9:34:00的发言:

可否贴得完整点呢?比如说前后句是啥,呵呵

51.The interview is an essential part of a successful hiring program because,with it,job applicants who have
personalities that are unsuited to the requirements of the job will be eliminated from consideration.

The argument above logically depends on which of the following assumptions?

(A)  A hiring program will be successful if it includes interviews.
(B)  The interview is a more important part of a successful hiring program than is the development of a job description.
(C)  Interviewers can accurately identify applicants whose personalities are unsuited to the requirements of the job。
(D)  The only purpose of an interview is to evaluate whether job applicants’ personalities are suited to the requirements of the job.
(E)  The fit of job applicants’ personalities to the requirements of the job was once the most important factor
in making hiring decisions.

Argument Construction
Situation The interview is a necessary part of hiring because candidates with unsuitable personalities are
eliminated from consideration.

Reasoning What is being assumed in this argument? The argument puts forth one reason that the interview is
important: it eliminates candidates with unsuitable personalities. The argument is logical only if it is
assumed that interviewing does indeed eliminate such candidates.The argument assumes that interviewers can
successfully screen candidates and rule out those whose personalities do not fit the needs of the job.

A  The argument does not go so far as to say that interviews guarantee a successful hiring program.
B   The argument does not prioritize the parts of a hiring program.
C   Correct.This statement properly identifies the assumption underlying the argument.
D   The argument gives one reason that the interview is important-but it does not say it is the only reason.
E   The argument does not indicate that past practice affects how hiring decisions are currently being made.

384#
发表于 2006-7-11 10:31:00 | 只看该作者

没有,在复习之前一直以为逻辑是我的最强项,复习以后,发现逻辑是最弱项。。。

现在能有40%的概率语法全对,阅读全对。更高的概率数学全对,但逻辑能有10%就谢天谢地了,而且,逻辑错了的时候还没有理由怨天尤人,找不到借口,只能说自己当初为什么母语就不是英语呢。。。。几个小单词怎么就那么多含义。。。

唉,逻辑。。。。。。

那题虽然都是他因削弱,但我觉得他给的解释并不能说是decrease。

385#
发表于 2006-7-11 10:33:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用kevin5在2006-7-11 10:29:00的发言:

51.The interview is an essential part of a successful hiring program because,with it,job applicants who have
personalities that are unsuited to the requirements of the job will be eliminated from consideration.

The argument above logically depends on which of the following assumptions?

(A)  A hiring program will be successful if it includes interviews.
(B)  The interview is a more important part of a successful hiring program than is the development of a job description.
(C)  Interviewers can accurately identify applicants whose personalities are unsuited to the requirements of the job。
(D)  The only purpose of an interview is to evaluate whether job applicants’ personalities are suited to the requirements of the job.
(E)  The fit of job applicants’ personalities to the requirements of the job was once the most important factor
in making hiring decisions.

Argument Construction
Situation The interview is a necessary part of hiring because candidates with unsuitable personalities are
eliminated from consideration.

Reasoning What is being assumed in this argument? The argument puts forth one reason that the interview is
important: it eliminates candidates with unsuitable personalities. The argument is logical only if it is
assumed that interviewing does indeed eliminate such candidates.The argument assumes that interviewers can
successfully screen candidates and rule out those whose personalities do not fit the needs of the job.

A  The argument does not go so far as to say that interviews guarantee a successful hiring program.
B   The argument does not prioritize the parts of a hiring program.
C   Correct.This statement properly identifies the assumption underlying the argument.
D   The argument gives one reason that the interview is important-but it does not say it is the only reason.
E   The argument does not indicate that past practice affects how hiring decisions are currently being made.

go so far as to say 如果就本文的意思就是已经衍生到。。或者已经达到。。。程度。。。

A的解释是说无关。。。

386#
发表于 2006-7-11 10:39:00 | 只看该作者

我的解释不一样

农民自己治了就不去报告兽医了

以前5头“报告”牛死了2个

现在小病农民不上报 但是该死的还是一样得死掉

3头“报告”牛挂了2个

不是毒素厉害了,原因是“隐瞒”发病   怎么觉得有点像sars时“某国政府的做法”?

387#
发表于 2006-7-11 10:45:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用顾风在2006-7-11 10:33:00的发言:

go so far as to say 如果就本文的意思就是已经衍生到。。或者已经达到。。。程度。。。

A的解释是说无关。。。

我觉得这道题是充分和必要互相颠倒了

essensial 是必要

if 充分

说无关好像不太对

388#
发表于 2006-7-11 10:49:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用allen0018在2006-7-11 10:39:00的发言:

我的解释不一样

农民自己治了就不去报告兽医了

以前5头“报告”牛死了2个

现在小病农民不上报 但是该死的还是一样得死掉

3头“报告”牛挂了2个

不是毒素厉害了,原因是“隐瞒”发病   怎么觉得有点像sars时“某国政府的做法”?

I suspect, 因为治这样类型的病需要的药是通过采购完成的,而且治牛的病是兽医的事情,farmers不具备这样的专业能力,只能推断,治病成本太高,所以farmers选择不汇报,因为report的目的是为了更好的控制与治疗,而不是简单的备案。
389#
发表于 2006-7-11 10:52:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用allen0018在2006-7-11 10:45:00的发言:

我觉得这道题是充分和必要互相颠倒了

essensial 是必要

if 充分

说无关好像不太对

A的解释是说并没有谈到这能保证成功,所以说A的意思是无关,当然,面试是好的招聘的必要条件,不是充分条件。

390#
发表于 2006-7-11 10:55:00 | 只看该作者

感谢顾风 回答数学

另外,我想知道你数学是怎么找到连接的?

tt 的题和xy,gwd编号对应关系是什么?

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-1-17 06:41
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部