ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: rheazhang
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[梦之队日记] 2006年8月队请进!欢迎大家来讨论

[精华] [复制链接]
1271#
发表于 2006-8-4 21:34:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用allen0018在2006-8-4 21:08:00的发言:

不是指他还活着,不定式的完成时 表示一种动作的前后顺序

建议看看og上有个什么病然后幸存者没几个那道题

有理~ 3X
1272#
发表于 2006-8-4 21:39:00 | 只看该作者
一定要在联系人当中才能加入群?
1273#
发表于 2006-8-4 21:52:00 | 只看该作者

可以加我MSN然候指点我一下吗? 我刚刚update 到8.0 找不到开群的function 啊

sensun45[在] yahoo.com

1274#
发表于 2006-8-4 22:02:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用sen4sun在2006-8-4 21:52:00的发言:

可以加我MSN然候指点我一下吗? 我刚刚update 到8.0 找不到开群的function 啊

sensun45[在] yahoo.com

我加了,你有反应吗?
1275#
发表于 2006-8-4 22:03:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用liquid_84在2006-8-4 21:39:00的发言:
一定要在联系人当中才能加入群?

这个可以设定的,我设定的是任何人都可以加入。。。

点群查找,输入群号 190012


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-8-4 22:04:03编辑过]
1276#
发表于 2006-8-4 22:38:00 | 只看该作者
啊,这个MSN8需要XP啊,我的WIN2K装不了,不下载了。M$太欺负银了。
[此贴子已经被作者于2006-8-4 22:39:31编辑过]
1277#
发表于 2006-8-4 22:43:00 | 只看该作者

老大,是丛MSN网址上下么?弱弱的问,在什么位置上啊,在下的版本上我找不到啊!

1278#
发表于 2006-8-4 22:47:00 | 只看该作者
little dou,你是大连人???

大全-20-12.    An advertisement designed to convince readers of the great durability of automobiles manufactured by the Deluxe Motor Car Company cites as evidence the fact that over half of all automobiles built by the company since 1970 are still on the road today, compared to no more than a third for any other manufacturer.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the advertisement’s argument?

(A) After taking inflation into account, a new Deluxe automobile costs only slightly more than a new model did in 1970.

(B) The number of automobiles built by Deluxe each year has not increased sharply since 1970.

(C) Owners of Deluxe automobiles typically keep their cars well maintained.

(D) Since 1970, Deluxe has made fewer changes in the automobiles it manufactures than other car companies have made in their automobiles.  B

(E) Deluxe automobiles have been selling at relatively stable prices in recent years.

讨论下d 选项
1279#
发表于 2006-8-4 22:48:00 | 只看该作者
1280#
发表于 2006-8-4 22:59:00 | 只看该作者

大全-20-7.      It is better for the environment if as much of all packaging as possible is made from materials that are biodegradable in landfills. Therefore, it is always a change for the worse to replace packaging made from paper or cardboard with packaging made from plastics that are not biodegradable in landfills.

Which of the following, if true, constitutes the strongest objection to the argument above?

(A) The paper and cardboard used in packaging are usually not biodegradable in landfills.

(B) Some plastic used in packaging is biodegradable in landfills.      和前提相反。

(C) In many landfills, a significant proportion of space is taken up by materials other than discarded packaging materials.

(D) It is impossible to avoid entirely the use of packaging materials that are not biodegradable in landfills.A

(E) Sometimes, in packaging an item, plastics that are not biodegradable in landfills are combined with cardboard.

 

如果b项改为所有的塑料都是可降解的话,当然是答案,因为其两个论据一为纸板可降解,一为塑料不可降解,前提是为了环境,所以反对哪一个论据都会削弱其结论。

1。原文推理中最大的问题在于:不知道paper and cardbord 生物可降解性怎样。不知道这信息就无法下结论。B严格讲是OUT OF SCOPE。因为原文结论是用不能降解的塑料去替代。跟能降解的塑料无关。

大家把b 看成是无关,还是否定前提,或者是some没有代表性???

以上2个意见都是nn views. so which one do you prefer?

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-5-5 12:01
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部