以下是引用mzyzhu在2003-9-28 17:20:00的发言: 首先ETS说,the animal hide and shield with wooden frame可以是一个item, 一个equipment,或者一个instrument, 单不是一个method.
其次,就算是后面的几个正确用法,ETS还认为不对。因为从逻辑上东东本身是不能提供保护的,只有using such kind of equipemnts才能保护战士。
第二题能否把原题清楚完整的贴出来,还有正确答案。
个人意见,仅供参考
39. For members of the seventeenth-century Ashanti nation in Africa, animal-hide shields with wooden frames were essential items of military equipment, a method to protect warriors against enemy arrows and spears. (A) a method to protect (B) as a method protecting (C) protecting (D) as a protection of (E) to protect Choice C is best because the participle protecting begins a phrase that explains what the shields did. Choices A and B awkwardly use the singular word method to refer to items of military equipment rather than to the use of such items. Also, a method of protecting would be more idiomatic than a method to protect in A or a method protecting in B. In B and D, as is incorrect; also, a protection in D has no noun for which it can logically substitute. Choice E is incomplete; used to protect would have been acceptable.
还有请看这道题A为什么不对,用一个概括性名词method做同位语这应该是ets的偏好所在。 Choices A and B awkwardly use the singular word method to refer to items of military equipment rather than to the use of such items.这句解释我看得也不是很懂,ets在此认为method是做解释性的同位语,而不是概括性的,为什么?
如此题: During and immediately after California gold rush,the way for a merchant to generate the most profit was to move a limited amount of scarce goods to San Francisco as quickly as possible ,rather than ((to carry larger loads more slowlyk,determining)) the design of the clipper ship.
b)to carry larger loads more slowly ,a stituation that determined
此题答案是b) stituation不就是概括性名词做同位语吗?
而我认为39题也一样,method就是用来概括animal-hide shields with wooden frames were essential items of military equipment的。正如stituation概括During and immediately after California gold rush,the way for a merchant to generate the most profit was to move a limited amount of scarce goods to San Francisco as quickly as possible ,rather than to carry larger loads more slowly一样,不是吗? |