以下是引用remeo在2003-9-28 17:08:00的发言: 39. For members of the seventeenth-century Ashanti nation in Africa, animal-hide shields with wooden frames were essential items of military equipment, a method to protect warriors against enemy arrows and spears. (A) a method to protect (B) as a method protecting (C) protecting (D) as a protection of (E) to protect 还有请看这道题A为什么不对,用一个概括性名词method做同位语这应该是ets的偏好所在。 Choices A and B awkwardly use the singular word method to refer to items of military equipment rather than to the use of such items.这句解释我看得也不是很懂,ets在此认为method是做解释性的同位语,而不是概括性的,为什么?
如果用概括性名词method做同位语,那么,前面应该要有一件事情可以概括为method。本题中没有,前面只是说: animal-hide shields (with wooden frames) were essential items of military equipment 你怎么能说这是一种method呢?
同意mzyzhu的论述:
以下是引用mzyzhu在2003-9-28 17:20:00的发言: 首先ETS说,the animal hide and shield with wooden frame可以是一个item, 一个equipment,或者一个instrument, 单不是一个method.
其次,就算是后面的几个正确用法,ETS还认为不对。因为从逻辑上东东本身是不能提供保护的,只有using such kind of equipemnts才能保护战士。
[此贴子已经被作者于2003-9-28 18:08:21编辑过] |