ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2678|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大家帮我解解惑吧,THANKS!~

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-9-26 12:02:00 | 只看该作者

大家帮我解解惑吧,THANKS!~

大家帮我解解惑吧,THANKS!~
in swartkans territory,archaeologists discovered charred bone fragments dating back 1 million years. aanalysis of the fragments,which came from a variety of animals,showed that they has been heated to temperatures no higher than those produced in experimental campfires made from branches of white stinkwood,the most common tree around swartkans.

which of the following,if true,would together with the information above,provide the best basis for the claim that the charred bome fragments are evidence of the use of fire by early hominids?

e the bone fragments were found in several distinct layers of limestone that contained primitive cutting tools known to have been used by early hominids.

不知道答案这个cutting tool和fire有什么关系啊?

it is very difficult to prove today that a painting done two or three hundred years ago, especially one without a signature or with a questionably authentic signature, is indubitably the work of this or that particualr artist. this fact gives the traditional attribution of a disputed painting special weight,since that attribution carries the presumption of historical continuity. consequently, an art historian arguing for a deattribution will generally convince other art historians only if he or she can persuasively argue for a specific reattribution.

which of the following,if true, most strongly supports the position that the traditional attribution of a disputed painting should not have special weight?

a  art dealers have always been led by economic self-interest to attribute an unsigned paintings of merit to recognized masters rather than to obscure artists.

我想问问大家这种很长而且逻辑关系感觉不是很明显的题目,大家怎么读题的?

television programing experts maintain that with each 1% increase in the prime -time ratings of a television station there is a 3.5% increase in the number of people who watch its evening news program.however,in the last ten years at channel ntr,there was only one year of extremely high prime-time ratings and during that year,fewer people than ever watched channel ntr's evening news program.


which of the following conclusions can properly be drawn from the statements above?

a when a news program has good ratings,the channel as a whole will have good ratings.
b  the programming experts neglected to consider daytime news programs.

c the year of high ratings at ntr was a result of two hit shows which were subsequently canceled because of contractual problems

d  the ten-year period in question is not representative of normal viewing patterns.
e  prime-time ratings are not the only factor affecting how many people watch an evening news program.

我选d,我觉的题目是说了一个普遍结论,但是后面这个case不符合这个结论,那么就说这个case不是具有代表性的。(因为结论是普遍的)

但答案是e,说除此还有其他原因。nn帮忙啊。。我现在是发现我在做不同题型时没有方法概念,不知道大家有什么好的建议?
沙发
发表于 2003-9-26 15:58:00 | 只看该作者
只能解释第一道题目了:

e就只能说明当时有人类存在,所以是support!

support并不是充分条件,只需要增加结论成立的可能性即可!
e再次体现了support解题的思路!

逻辑其实就考阅读,我想没有什么好办法了!

最后那道题:我觉得d可以用无关词排除掉!
板凳
发表于 2003-9-26 16:16:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用qiqi_cola在2003-9-26 12:02:00的发言:
不知道答案这个cutting tool和fire有什么关系啊?

原文中有提到they has been heated to temperatures no higher than those produced in experimental campfires made from branches of white stinkwood。有cutting tool说明可能当时的原始人类使用cutting tool采伐white stinkwood来生火。
地板
发表于 2003-9-26 20:43:00 | 只看该作者
Qiqi-cola:
the 2nd question and 3 rd one is belonging the questions that if only u get the essence of reasoning, u can work it out.  so if u have problems with such questions, I think u haven't get the rope of its hidden meaning and reasoning.
No other better way to solve it out.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-1 18:00
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部