ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: iselibra
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教OG-13题

[复制链接]
21#
发表于 2005-12-11 11:11:00 | 只看该作者
受益匪浅,谢谢!
22#
发表于 2005-12-25 20:18:00 | 只看该作者

回复:(lost_my_account)以下是引用iselibra在2003-...

以下是引用lost_my_account在2004-7-2 22:39:00的发言:


machine-tool manufacturing base shrinks 是事实

国防部担心它,是因为害怕它影响到美军长期作战的能力,因此,他们要求进口配额,好让自己的machine-tool发展。

然而,在国防部关心这件事情之前,这个行业就已经请求政府实施进口配额了。原因显而易见,缺乏政策性的保护,无法与进口产品竞争,让他们很不利。他们没有从国防事业考虑。

如果学过国际贸易,这几乎就是本能反应,连题目都不一定要看完。

精彩! 赞!
23#
发表于 2006-3-7 21:15:00 | 只看该作者

倒,楼上的赞的那个理解好像不对啊,根本就是从自己的常识推出来的


正确的理解应该是OG的解释: C, the best answer, explains that the industry turned to this issue because others tended to be ineffective in efforts to obtain governmental protection.


C解释了制造业除了以国防为理由获得政府保护,其他理由都很难有效

24#
发表于 2006-9-3 10:42:00 | 只看该作者
造福后人啊~~~
25#
发表于 2006-9-4 14:58:00 | 只看该作者
这题用 否B推否A来做吧...
26#
发表于 2006-10-24 22:30:00 | 只看该作者

Since the size of the machine-tool manufacturing base presumably has implications in area beyond national security

不懂OG解释里这句话的意思。。。


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-10-24 22:42:58编辑过]
27#
发表于 2006-10-27 10:34:00 | 只看该作者
understand now~~
28#
发表于 2006-10-27 11:07:00 | 只看该作者

这道题的答案就是C啊。。。本来就不是B

好好看看og的答案啊。。。不要误导大家

Which of the following, if true, contributes most to an explanation of the machine-tool industry’s raising the issue above regarding national security?

A. When the aircraft industries retooled, they provided a large amount of work for too builders.

B. The Defense Department is only marginally concerned with the effects of foreign competition on the machine-tool industry.

C. The machine-tool industry encountered difficulty in obtaining governmental protection against imports on grounds other than defense.

D. A few weapons important for defense consist of parts that do not require extensive machining.

E. Several federal government programs have been designed which will enable domestic machine-tool manufacturing firms to compete successfully with foreign toolmakers.

 

13.

Since the size of the machine-tool manufacturing base presumably has implications in area beyond national security, one might find it surprising that the industry raised the security issue in its petition. C, the best answer, explains that the industry turned to this issue because others tended to be ineffective in efforts to obtain governmental protection.

 

A explains why the industry might NOT raise the security issue, since it suggests that it might have raised the issue of jobs instead. B explains why the industry might NOT raise the security issue about import quotas, since it suggests that the Defense Department had no interest in import quotas whatsoever. Neither of D and E is relevant to the industry’s choice of strategy for securing import quotas.

29#
发表于 2008-4-30 11:56:00 | 只看该作者

简言之:

出现问题后----才能提出问题

however,出现问题前----企业就把问题提出来.(所以,矛盾点就是这个-----也是理解问题的关键.)

问题:企业能把这个问题提出来的最好解释是什么?

C,因为,企业尝试很多方法来获得进口限额,但是就这个借口国防没有被拒绝.所以,很偶然把问题提出来”---(把国防与import限额的关系联系起来)
30#
发表于 2010-10-10 23:20:36 | 只看该作者
看来做CR首要的前提就是把RC弄好
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-9 01:23
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部