ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2007|回复: 9
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]OG-154,谢谢!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-4-5 14:11:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]OG-154,谢谢!

154.


Start-up companies financed by venture capitalist have a much lower failure rate than companies financed by other means. Source of financing, therefore, must be a more important causative factor in the success of a start-up company than are such factors as the personal characteristics of the entrepreneur, the quality of strategic planning, or the management structure of the company.



Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?



(A) Venture capitalists tend to be more responsive than other sources of financing to changes in a start-up company’s financial needs.


(B) The strategic planning of a start-up company is a less important factor in the long-term success of the company than are the personal characteristics of the entrepreneur.


(C) More than half of all new companies fall within five years.


(D) The management structures of start-up companies are generally less formal than the management structures of ongoing businesses.


(E) Venture capitalists base their decisions to fund start-up companies on such factors as the characteristics of the entrepreneur and quality of strategic planning of the company.


并不是很清楚154题的逻辑关系:


前提venture capitalist --》lower failure rate,所以结论Source of financing更重要。


第一种理解:答案是E,Venture capitalists 是基于characteristics和quality,所以characteristics和quality比Venture capitalists 更重要,这是他因weaken吗?


OG的解释是


it is possible that companies with those combinations of factors that are most likely to lead to success are the very companies that venture capitalists select for financing. This weakens the argument that the financing itself must be more important for success than those factors. Thus, E is the best answer.


第二种理解:characteristics和quality--》lower failure rate(成功率高),直接weaken前提?


请问牛牛,是哪一种正确?


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-4-5 14:12:56编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2006-4-5 14:27:00 | 只看该作者

这题通过把结论的平行关系削弱,说明主因实际上是次因的果。而这主因不构成因:)(象佛经。。。)


你的第一种理解是不对的。


实际上是因为战略好,团队好,所以风投喜欢投。这是OG的解释。即风投喜欢投具备成功因素的企业。


而不是说风投是企业成功的因素,呵呵。这题正好是本行:)

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2006-4-7 13:21:00 | 只看该作者

楼上的解释是不是这么理解的:


原文:venture capitalist --》成功率高,所以venture capitalist 比characteristics和quality重要


E:venture capitalist基于characteristics和quality,也就是characteristics和quality决定venture capitalist


OG的解释:characteristics和quality--》成功率高--》venture capitalist select for financing


那就是因果倒置喽?


还是不是很明白,E是直接weaken结论,但OG的解释E是weaken前提???

地板
发表于 2006-4-7 13:40:00 | 只看该作者

前提还是结论不重要..重要的是1楼说的,


这题看内容理解比较好

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-4-10 09:03:00 | 只看该作者

狂汗,我好象还是不是很明白,到底是不是因果倒置?E是直接weaken结论,还是象OG的解释的那样E是weaken前提???

6#
发表于 2006-4-11 09:53:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得是 weaken了这个前提 。


在这个假设里说明 venture与其它因素一样是企业成功的重要因素是因为ventrue的企业失败率低。


即使venture真是企业成功的重要因素,但并不是因为这个假设,因为venture喜欢投具备其它成功因素的企业从根本上否定了这个理由推出结论的过程。

7#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-4-12 08:19:00 | 只看该作者

E:venture capitalist基于characteristics和quality,也就是characteristics和quality决定venture capitalist


也就是characteristics和quality--》venture capitalist select for financing


OG的解释:characteristics和quality--》成功率高--》venture capitalist select for financing


OG的解释多加了--》成功率高一步推理,所以E是weaken了这个前提?


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-4-12 8:27:48编辑过]
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-4-14 09:36:00 | 只看该作者
up
9#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-4-16 10:40:00 | 只看该作者
up
10#
发表于 2006-7-1 02:30:00 | 只看该作者

前提:风投成功率高于其他方式的投资.

结论:投资方式比其他因素(不是"其他方式的投资")更能导致企业成功.

这个结论的assumption是投资方式与其他因素无关?

所以E反了这个assumption?

到底是怎样的逻辑关系?

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-15 12:11
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部