以下是引用jessicaf在2006-3-24 9:15:00的发言:
Do you think 1/2 -1/3 is very high for a strong finance school? If I told you that for some other schools the ratio is at least 60%-70%? BTW, as such a high ratio like 60% - 70%, not every Chinese can locate a job on the street, especially for people directly from Mainland.
is it true that Chinese/(descendant) MBA applicants from non-Mainland are more aggressive, because they believe they have the best of two/three/four worlds? I am just citing some un/reliable source of anecdotes as reference information (sort of) for the OP, not TELLing him/her the conclusion. So you do NOT have to fanfare your presumable expertise.
to answer you question in detail, I have to refer to the subject of comparing variances of two/more different samples, which I think perhaps is too technical to be discussed on this forum. My general remark would be: it depends on your own interpretation of the ratio.
To me, a high or low ratio of MBA grads going to the Street is a skewed mathematical expectation or biased prediction of OP's chance of landing a job on the Street, because the statistic assumption in those cases perhaps are no longer upheld. In addition, even an acurate mathematical expectation of Street-probability of the sample would just translates into the Statistic Average CHANCE of any specific individual of the sample securing a position on the Street. But sadly, 1) statistics is not science, as stochastic process is not repeatable; and 2) in the end, OP would either 100% or 0% landing a job on the Street. So the value of ratios, in my opinion, should be taken with a grain of salt.
It is true that MBA programs perhaps is most about business, but I think it should also incorporate advanced education about self-esteem and respect.
Anyway, you just remind me of one old saying I learned more than a decade ago--"It takes all kinds to make a world."   |