Getting into a Top 5 MBA Program 2005 applicant guide to Harvard, Kellogg, MIT, Stanford, Wharton, and other top business schools.
This document has been prepared by a group of graduates of various top US business schools, now working for an international strategy consulting firm. It is intended as an information resource for our colleagues considering applying to business school in the future. We encourage you to choose which schools are right for you and investigate them thoroughly before applying.
|
 |
Why
a Top MBA?
Unlike graduates of medical schools and law schools, there
is no licensing exam required to practice business in the United States. In
addition, the quality of accredited schools offering MBA degrees varies tremendously.
This is a degree you can obtain part-time in 4 years, in an executive program
in 1 year, via correspondence courses, and from schools with near 100% acceptance
rates.
As a result, the value of your MBA degree is directly related
to the prestige of the university and business school which grants it.
A recent study of the value of MBA programs concluded that “if you
don’t get into a leading business school, the economic value of the degree
is really quite limited.” [1]
The study examined consultants at McKinsey & Company and investment bankers
at Goldman, Sachs & Co. and found that those without MBA’s performed as
well, or better, than business school graduates. The fallacy of the study
was that it did not recognize that it is much harder to get such a job without
an MBA degree. Intellectual horsepower and potential – rather than business
knowledge – is the primary criterion top consulting firms and investment banks
look for. If someone possesses a Ph.D. in economics from MIT or a JD from
Harvard – quite common at such firms – then that obviously serves as a more
than adequate intellectual proxy for even a top two-year MBA.
The required curriculum at most business schools consists
of courses such as finance, accounting, statistics, organizational behavior,
strategy, economics, communications and technology. Schools may have a larger
or smaller set of “core” courses, and many give these subjects different names.
But overall, MBA programs have more similarities with one another than they
do differences, and most of the same subjects are taught from the same textbooks,
using many of the same cases.
Thus, the academic content of a business school education
– much like a law school or medical school education – does not vary greatly
between programs. But due to the tremendous variation in the standards of
institutions conferring the degree, an MBA has the most value in the marketplace
when it is from a school that is highly respected. In addition, the lifelong
professional network which comes from going to business school is more valuable
when it is from a school where graduates typically go on to the most successful
careers.
Ranking
the Rankings
There is no other academic degree which is ranked and analyzed by so many
publications and organizations as the MBA. While the general public and the
business world have intuitive ideas of which the most famous and prestigious
programs are, many of these rankings have highlighted improvements in other
programs and presented them as viable competitors. Nonetheless, the traditional
top schools perform the best across the best-regarded rankings.
US News and BusinessWeek
US News & World Report and BusinessWeek are the most
well-known and respected MBA rankings, and have each been published for more
than 10 years. New rankings from the Financial Times, Forbes, the Economist
and the Wall Street Journal have come out in the last few years. Each ranking
has strengths and weaknesses.
US News is generally considered the best ranking for prospective MBA applicants,
as their system is the most transparent, and their rankings always come closest
to peoples’ common sense perception of relative prestige. This is no accident,
since their ranking heavily favors "peer assessment", which is essentially
"prestige", as one of their key factors. There are three schools
which have been ranked #1 by US News in the past ten years – the Stanford
Graduate School of Business, Harvard Business School, and the MIT Sloan School
of Management.
BusinessWeek is considered the next most useful ranking for
applicants, since they collect a great deal of data and weight their ranking
toward student feedback. Yet, none of Harvard, Stanford or MIT has ever
been ranked #1 by BusinessWeek. Instead, the only schools to achieve the
top position in their ranking are the Wharton School of the University of
Pennsylvania, and the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University.
Business School |
Highest Ranking in US News |
Highest Ranking in BusinessWeek |
Harvard Business School |
1 |
3 |
Stanford Graduate School of Business |
1 |
4 |
MIT Sloan School of Management |
1 |
4 |
Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania |
2 |
1 |
Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University |
3 |
1 |
Outside of these five schools, no other school has ever been
ranked #1 in either of these rankings. BusinessWeek displays some variation,
but has generally had each of these schools in or near the top 5. In US News,
they have consistently been the top five schools every year the ranking has
been published.
Other Rankings
The newer rankings, The Financial Times, Forbes, and the
Wall Street Journal, are essentially specialty rankings which weight specifically
chosen criteria very heavily to produce different results. The end results
have some similarities with US News and BusinessWeek, but also produce many
curious outcomes for individual schools and are more useful for the data they
collect than the rankings they produce. A summary of the methodology issues
with these rankings:
Ranking |
Methodology |
Problems |
Financial Times |
Focuses on self-reported salary data several years post-graduation |
Unreliable and incomplete data: self-reporting bias |
Forbes |
Focuses on self-reported salary data several years post-graduation; focuses on ROI |
Unreliable and incomplete data: self-reporting bias; penalizes schools with high entering salaries (inversely correlates program quality and applicant salary) |
Wall Street Journal |
Based entirely on recruiter satisfaction |
Recruiters who tend to be unsuccessful at attracting interest from students at top schools tend to give those schools poor marks (inversely correlates program quality and graduate choices) |
These methodology problems produce some questionable results,
such as the Wall Street Journal ranking Stanford outside of the top 40, Forbes
ranking MIT Sloan outside the top 15, and the Financial Times ranking Yale
and NYU ahead of Kellogg. As such, the top business schools don't pay as much
attention to these rankings. Stanford's dean even commented, quite justifiably,
that doing poorly in the Wall Street Journal ranking was probably a better
indicator of the quality of a program than doing well!
The Top Programs
Harvard, Stanford, MIT Sloan,
Kellogg and Wharton stand out consistently
amongst their peers, and have historically been considered the most prestigious
MBA programs. They are also considered the best programs today.
Two other notable programs are the University of Chicago
and Columbia Business School. In fact, the deans of
Harvard, Kellogg, MIT Sloan, Stanford, Wharton, Columbia and Chicago, meet
regularly to share benchmarking information, and generally consider each other
to be peer schools.
The reason that Columbia and Chicago are generally considered just below
the other five is because they carry somewhat less prestige, as reflected
in a couple of key statistics. Columbia used to have a 46% acceptance rate
as recently as 10 years ago, far higher than any other top school, admitting
nearly half of all applicants. Meanwhile, Chicago consistently has a much
higher acceptance rate than any other top school (above 25-30%) and through
much of the last 10 years maintained a 50% yield – in other words, nearly
half of the people offered admission to Chicago choose not to attend. Nonetheless,
these two schools are considered among the most prestigious after the top
5, and are even ranked in the top 5 in some finance-heavy rankings. Siebel's
"Siebel Scholars" program recognizes the top MBA students in the United States
by awarding $25000 scholarships to the top five students at each of Harvard,
Stanford, Sloan, Wharton, Kellogg and Chicago.
After these seven schools, other well known and highly regarded programs
include:
Top MBA programs by subject area – one of the best ways
to think about the top five MBA programs is to consider that they are all
excellent in nearly every discipline, but are #1 in different specific subject
areas:
Business School |
US News #1 in 2006 for... |
BusinessWeek "top-rated" in 2005 for... |
Harvard Business School |
- Management |
- Finance
- Management
- Entrepreneurship |
Stanford Graduate School of Business |
- N/A |
- Management
- Entrepreneurship |
MIT Sloan School of Management |
- Information Systems
- Production/Operations
- Supply Chain/Logistics |
- Finance
- Management
- Marketing
- Entrepreneurship |
Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania |
- Finance
- Accounting |
- Finance
- Management
- Marketing
- Entrepreneurship |
Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University |
- Marketing |
- Management
- Marketing |
Yield – that is, the % of students who accept offers
of admission. While some less prestigious programs may have high yields because
of a highly targeted audience, the top programs are certainly competing with
one another for many of the same students. In other words, the typical explanation
for someone turning down an offer of admission at one top business school
is because they accepted the offer of a school they would rather attend. Since
top candidates receive more offers of admission, their choice of program is
a factor which can be used to gauge the quality of each program. The yields
of the top schools (2004 figures) are:
|
School Name |
Yield |
Acceptance Rate |
1 |
Harvard |
85% |
12% |
2 |
Stanford |
83% |
9% |
3 |
MIT Sloan |
75% |
18% |
3 |
Wharton |
75% |
15% |
5 |
Columbia |
71% |
13% |
6 |
Kellogg |
66% |
16% |
7 |
Chicago |
58% |
28% |
Endowment – this is kind of like the market capitalization
of a business school, in a somewhat silly way. If a school has many graduates
who have gone on to become very wealthy, it should have a lot of money in
its endowment fund. If the school is well-managed, that fund should grow and
help it attract more successful students. These are the top 10 schools by
endowment (BusinessWeek, 2001):
|
School Name |
Endowment ($ millions) |
Endowment per student ($ 000) |
1 |
Harvard |
1100 |
628 |
2 |
MIT Sloan |
402 |
560 |
3 |
Stanford |
387 |
530 |
4 |
Kellogg |
380 |
152 |
5 |
Wharton |
338 |
216 |
6 |
Michigan |
267 |
138 |
7 |
Darden |
255 |
523 |
7 |
Yale |
255 |
607 |
9 |
Chicago |
207 |
87 |
10 |
Tuck |
167 |
420 |
The reason the per-capita endowment figures for schools like
Chicago and Kellogg are so low is because they spread their resources amongst
a large number of full-time and part-time students. Harvard, MIT, Stanford
and Wharton do not have part-time programs.
Famous Alumni – so who goes on to fame and fortune
with an MBA degree? Besides George W. Bush, the nation’s first MBA president
(Harvard ‘75), the most prominent MBA’s are CEO’s of the world’s largest companies.
MBA Jungle analyzed the Fortune 200 to see where their CEO’s went to school.
The list, once again, has the top schools well-represented, and shows Harvard’s
strength historically:
|
School Name |
# of Fortune 200 CEO’s |
1 |
Harvard |
20 |
2 |
MIT Sloan |
5 |
3 |
Stanford |
4 |
3 |
Columbia |
4 |
3 |
Chicago |
4 |
6 |
NYU Stern |
3 |
7 |
Kellogg |
2 |
7 |
Darden |
2 |
7 |
Goizueta |
2 |
7 |
Indiana |
2 |
7 |
Texas |
2 |
In the past 100 years, Harvard has been the most popular
destination for those interested in an MBA. Of course, the MBA was a completely
different animal just 20 years ago. Back then, most students went directly
out of college, and the competition and prestige were nothing like it is today.
It is worth noting that only 79 CEO’s in the Fortune 200 had MBA degrees at
all – but the MBA accounted for more than two-thirds of all graduate degrees
held by these CEO’s. Although Wharton only had 1 CEO in the Fortune 200, they
have historically had more, and this particular ranking is always in a state
of flux.
The rest of this document will focus on the top 5 programs,
but the same principles apply to the admissions process at most top 10 or
top 20 programs.
Keys to Admission
Your GMAT score, undergraduate GPA, and the number of years
of work experience you possess are the primary quantitative indicators used
by business school admissions committees. Here is how the top 5 schools stack
up on those measures:
|
Business School |
Median GMAT |
Median GPA |
Mean Work Experience (Years) |
|
Stanford |
710 |
3.5 |
4.0 |
|
MIT Sloan |
700 |
3.4 |
5.3 |
|
Harvard |
700 |
3.6 |
4.4 |
|
Wharton |
710 |
3.5 |
5.8 |
|
Kellogg |
700 |
3.4 |
5.2 |
As of this writing, this means that more than half of all
students attending these schools scored in the top 5% of all GMAT test takers
worldwide. It also means that somewhat less than half did not. The GMAT is
the primary indicator of raw intellectual ability considered by admissions
committees, since it is standardized, and offers an objective – albeit incomplete
– measure of ability between students
from different colleges and majors. If you are lower than your target school’s
average on any of these measures, it should be compensated by all of the other
areas. In other words, if you expect to get in to Wharton with only 2 years
of full-time work experience, you should have a very high GMAT score and GPA
amongst other things.
Retaking the GMAT – this is only useful if your highest
score is below your target school’s median. Retaking the GMAT to get a 730
when you already have a 710 is reasonably meaningless and shows you to be
focused on the wrong things. Of course, getting a 720 after previously scoring
a 670 may greatly help your candidacy. While most schools say you can take
the GMAT as many times as you want, you should never take the test without
proper preparation, as the entire process can be quite arduous. Prepare by
taking practice tests – particularly CAT simulations – and if you find that
you are not scoring 700+ with regularity, you should consider taking a course
to prepare.
Although admissions committees at top schools say that a
low GMAT score won’t keep you out, those who get in with scores in the low
600’s are almost certainly exceptional cases. If you are the average candidate
without any internationally impressive accomplishments, a low GMAT score almost
guarantees you a dreaded “ding” letter. On the other hand, for the candidate
who is average in all other respects, a 790 isn’t much different from a 740
from the school’s point of view. Most schools will admit two otherwise similar
candidates with disparate but high GMAT scores based on characteristics other
than the GMAT. As for the people who get in with scores from 650 to 700, admissions
can be frustratingly random – even more so than for everyone else.
While the overall GMAT score is what will be counted most
heavily, the quantitative score is more important for applicants with non-technical
backgrounds while the verbal score is examined more closely for applicants
from foreign countries and those with science or engineering degrees. Schools
are merely looking for the assurance that a candidate will be able to both
crunch numbers and communicate well. Assuming that the overall GMAT score
is alright, only a seriously low score on the section that will be examined
most closely for a given candidate would be a liability. For example, if you
are a native english speaker and have good grades from an Ivy League college
in Literature, they probably won’t be too concerned about a low score on the
verbal section, and just consider it an aberration. However, a low score on
the quantitative section – regardless of how strong your combined GMAT score
is – could be a major liability. The AWA score is not important for most applicants,
and is not factored into the overall GMAT score anyway. In some cases, the
actual text of the AWA section might be compared to an applicant’s essays
if the schools are skeptical about either’s authenticity.
How the GPA is evaluated – top business schools are
not as focused on undergraduate grades as other professional programs. If
you have a 99th percentile LSAT score, and a 4.0 GPA in Political
Science from Princeton, you will almost definitely get into Yale Law School.
If you score 9.2 on the MCAT and graduate with a 3.4 in music, you will almost
definitely not get into Johns Hopkins Medical School. On the other
hand, if you graduate first in your class in finance at NYU, get a 780 on
the GMAT, and work at Boston Consulting Group for three years, the admissions
committee at Stanford Business School could decide they’ve already let in
enough people like you, and the spot could go to someone with a 3.2 GPA in
English who worked in a NGO in Africa. The bottom line is that if you are
still in school, you should try to get the very best grades you can, but afterwards
you just have to live with them. If you did poorly in undergraduate, good
graduate degree grades help offset the impression that you’re incapable of
getting good grades, but they don’t undo the damage your GPA does to the school’s
average. Thus, letting you in becomes a very context and timing-driven judgment
call.
Essays – there are typically two to seven essay questions
in each application, with between 2000 and 3000 words required in total. While
the first application will take you the longest, and you can cut-and-paste
many paragraphs into subsequent essays, overall the differing nature of school’s
questions will require you to spend many days on each package to create a
satisfactory product. The essays are your primary opportunity to convince
the school to let you in. They will evaluate you on two dimensions: what you
will bring to the school as an MBA student, and what you will bring to the
school as an alumnus. The second criterion is obviously the most important.
Schools are trying to select the applicants they believe will be the most
successful in their careers based on their backgrounds and accomplishments
to date. Put another way, the 10-20% of applicants who get into a top business
school are the ones who least needed the top MBA degree to succeed
in their careers. Ironic, but true.
Of course, most of the applicants to top schools are reasonably
successful in their careers already, so your essays need to distinguish you
from others in your peer group. Your peer group – those applicants who are
most like you – is who you are competing against primarily. For example, any
top school could fill up their entire class with analysts from consulting
firms with high GMAT scores and GPA’s. But they won’t. Instead, they will
have a certain number of spots for such applicants, and someone who was a
sculptor would not be competing for one of those spaces. This makes some peer
groups more competitive than others in any given year. Most schools will say
that every candidate competes against every other candidate, and from a certain
point of view this is true. Someone could be a consultant, and even though
they have already let in more consultants than they would like, he could bring
something so special to the class from other experiences that they decide
to let him in too. But in such a situation, the candidate likely won’t get
in on strong numbers alone.
Your essays also give the school a sense of your personality.
They want to see how you work your argument and the reasons they should admit
you into your writing – while still answering their questions directly. They
want you to be able to list and explain your accomplishments without being
boastful or off-topic. These are, of course, the same skills you will need
to be successful in your career after graduation.
Many people have taken to using admissions and essay consultants,
and most schools will tell you that they discourage this. It is our opinion
that the vast majority of successful candidates do not use paid essay
editing services, and the majority of those who do use such services do not
get in. This makes sense, of course – the people that need those services
the most are the weakest candidates, and they’re on their own when it comes
to a final interview. But beyond that, admissions consultants are invariably
not the kind of people that a candidate to a top school wants advice
from. Most did not ever attend a top business school themselves, and those
few that did were essentially not successful enough to find reasonable jobs
afterwards – and thus got into the essay editing business. We encourage you
to get someone else to look at your essays and make suggestions, but pick
someone who isn’t being paid on the basis of how much of your time they take,
or how many changes they suggest you make. Perhaps there’s nothing wrong with
your essays at all!
On the other hand, you should collect as much information
and advice on the admissions process as you can, but always take it with a
grain of salt. An unsuccessful applicant may not always be right about why
they didn’t get in, but alumni of a given school can usually give you a pretty
accurate picture of what it takes to get in. Written information sources are
also essential, and this guide assumes that you’ve probably already picked
up Richard Montauk’s excellent book, “How to Get Into The Top MBA Programs”.
Although his advice is more generic – and thus applicable to any MBA program,
but not customized for the truly best programs – you need to learn everything
about the process. You should use that book with this guide to tune your application
for top 5 schools.
Recommendations – these are most certainly the least
important part of your application, but you shouldn’t discount them. They
should reinforce what their rest of your package says, and provide the opinion
of a real person who knows you very well and can answer the school’s
questions directly and honestly. Every school will tell you this, and you
should listen. The truth is that school’s know that many applicants write
their own recommendations and just get their recommenders to sign and send
them.
When to apply – the earlier the better, in general.
Schools have either 2 or 3 application deadlines (rounds) and round 3 is almost
always incredibly difficult to get in. This is just because statistically,
there are very few spots left open by the third round. While some people believe
that round 2 can be best for candidates without extremely strong backgrounds,
it’s our belief that the first round is the best if you can get your application
up to a desirable standard of quality in time.
The Interview – Harvard, Sloan, Stanford and Wharton
all interview candidates by invitation only. This means that if you receive
an interview – and at Harvard and Sloan, nearly all accepted candidates are
required to interview – then this is your last and best opportunity to convince
the admissions committee that you are someone they would like to have at their
school. At Kellogg, all applicants are required to interview, so this changes
the dynamic of the session significantly. Instead of the interview being an
opportunity for you to address any weaknesses and convince them to let you
in, it is merely another data point taken with the rest of your application.
Put another way, a strong interview at Kellogg can’t get you in – but a weak
interview can, and will, keep you out.
Conclusion
Attending one of the top business schools in the United States
is really an amazing experience that we would recommend to anyone. Our classmates
from business school are some of our closest friends, and the value of the
network after graduation is immeasurable. We believe that you will be best
served by attending the very best school you can get into, so never set your
sights too low for reasons of expense, geography or other hassles.
Take a risk, and apply to some great programs – you won’t
regret it.
Good luck!
Harvard Business
School
Harvard University
Boston, Massachusetts
http://www.hbs.edu
HINTS
Harvard is obsessed with
leadership, and they are looking for indications of leadership ability in
each of their candidates. This can be in the form of managerial work experience,
extracurricular activities, or initiative taken in other forms. What is more
important than demonstrated leadership is to convince them that you have the
capability for taking on great responsibility and taking charge of a situation
in the future. Harvard is considered the #1 general management school by US
News (and most of the world), so personal well-roundedness is key.
FAMOUS ALUMNI SAMPLE
George W. Bush, President,
United States of America
Louis Gerstner, former
Chairman, IBM Corporation
Rajat Gupta, former Worldwide
Managing Director, McKinsey & Company
Jeffrey Immelt, CEO, General
Electric Company
Jeff Skilling, former
CEO, Enron Corporation
ADMISSIONS STATISTICS
Application Rounds: 3
Class Size: 910
Applicants: 8,893
Waitlist Size: NOT
RELEASED
Waitlist Acceptance Rate:
NOT RELEASED
FINANCIAL AID
Annual budget: $54,800
Guaranteed loans available
for all students.
FURTHER INFORMATION
BusinessWeek Profile
http://www.businessweek.com/bschools/04/full_time_profiles/harvard.htm
Harvard MBA Admissions
http://www.hbs.edu/mba/index.html
Kellogg School
of Management
Northwestern University
Evanston, Illinois
http://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu
HINTS
Kellogg believes that teamwork
is what builds great organizations, and the ability to work with, and co-exist
with others in the business school environment is their primary screening
criterion. Kellogg is ranked as the #1 school for marketing, so communications
ability and softer skills are more valued here – and expected – than at other
top programs. As was mentioned earlier, the interview has a different nature
at Kellogg than at other schools, and they want to see if you are the Kellogg
“type”, and excited about their program specifically.
FAMOUS ALUMNI SAMPLE
Michael Borman, President,
Blue Martini Software
Leland Brendsel, CEO,
Freddie Mac
John Hoeven, Governor,
State of North Dakota
James Keyes, CEO, Johnson
Controls
Locke Burt, Senator, State
of Florida
ADMISSIONS STATISTICS
Application Rounds: 3
Class Size: 625
Applicants: 6,039
Waitlist Size: NOT
RELEASED
Waitlist Acceptance Rate:
NOT RELEASED
FINANCIAL AID
Annual budget: $52,533
Guaranteed loans available
for all students.
FURTHER INFORMATION
BusinessWeek Profile
http://www.businessweek.com/bschools/04/full_time_profiles/kellogg.htm
Kellogg MBA Admissions
http://www.kellogg.nwu.edu/admissions/index.htm
MIT
Sloan School of Management
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, Massachusetts
http://mitsloan.mit.edu
HINTS
Sloan wants to admit a
class of innovators. What is most important is to convince the admissions
committee that your career will involve having a great impact on your organization
or industry, and that you have the creativity and courage to take it on great
challenges. Sloan is ranked the #1 school for technology, operations management
and quantitative analysis, so strong business analytical skills are expected,
but communications ability is what distinguishes successful applicants.
FAMOUS ALUMNI SAMPLE
Kofi Annan, Secretary-General,
United Nations
Carly Fiorina, former
CEO, Hewlett-Packard Corporation
William Clay Ford, CEO,
Ford Motor Company
Benjamin Netanyahu, former
Prime Minister, Israel
John Reed, Chairman, New
York Stock Exchange
ADMISSIONS STATISTICS
Application Rounds: 2
Class Size: 319
Applicants: 2,940
Waitlist Size: 208
Waitlist Acceptance Rate:
15%
FINANCIAL AID
Annual budget: $55,310
Guaranteed loans available
for all students.
FURTHER INFORMATION
BusinessWeek Profile
http://www.businessweek.com/bschools/04/full_time_profiles/sloan.htm
Sloan MBA Admissions
http://mitsloan.mit.edu/mba
Stanford
Graduate School of Business
Stanford University
Stanford, California
http://www.gsb.stanford.edu
HINTS
With the highest average
GMAT score in the world and the lowest acceptance rate, Stanford is the most
difficult business school to gain admission into on the basis of numbers alone.
That being said, they have a very diverse class mix and a balance curriculum
that emphasizes both hard and soft skills. The key to admission is convincing
the committee that you are bringing something unique to the class. While Stanford
is not ranked #1 in any sub-specialty, it is strong in many areas.
FAMOUS ALUMNI SAMPLE
Steve Ballmer, CEO, Microsoft
Corporation (dropped out after 1 year)
John Donahoe, former Worldwide
Managing Director, Bain & Company
Philip Knight, CEO, Nike
Corporation
Scott McNealy, CEO, Sun
Microsystems
Charles Schwab, Chairman,
Charles Schwab Corporation
ADMISSIONS STATISTICS
Application Rounds: 3
Class Size: 378
Applicants: 5,253
Waitlist Size: 243
Waitlist Acceptance Rate:
9%
FINANCIAL AID
Annual budget: $48,012
Guaranteed loans available
for all students.
FURTHER INFORMATION
BusinessWeek Profile
http://www.businessweek.com/bschools/04/full_time_profiles/stanford.htm
Stanford MBA Admissions
http://www.gsb.stanford.edu/mba/
Wharton School
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
http://www.wharton.upenn.edu
HINTS
The Wharton School is ranked as
the #1 school in finance and accounting, and their emphasis is definitely
on business fundamentals. Although the class has the same number of years
of work experience as at other top programs, the average age skews a little
higher, and thus maturity is definitely valued by the admissions committee.
The admissions committee at Wharton is looking for talented, hard-working
individuals that have achieved a great deal but are not arrogant about it.
FAMOUS ALUMNI SAMPLE
Reginald Jones, former
CEO, General Electric Company
Shaun O’Malley, former
Chairman, PriceWaterhouseCoopers, LLP
Louis Platt, former CEO,
Hewlett-Packard Corporation
Donald Trump, CEO, Trump
Organization
Gary Wilson, Chairman,
Northwest Airlines
ADMISSIONS STATISTICS
Application Rounds: 3
Class Size: 771
Applicants: 7,274
Waitlist Size: 371
Waitlist Acceptance Rate:
23%
FINANCIAL AID
Annual budget: $59,728
Guaranteed loans available
for all students.
FURTHER INFORMATION
BusinessWeek Profile
http://www.businessweek.com/bschools/04/full_time_profiles/wharton.htm
Wharton MBA Admissions
http://www.wharton.upenn.edu/mba