37.冰河时代美洲动物灭绝,而欧洲动物没有灭绝, 肯定有其它原因. 假设--欧洲动物不比美洲的更适应 38. the output of shrimps for many boat owners increased a lot, to the amount of a million tons, in the past several year, many shoppers have bought many shrimps from retailers at least50 million tons annually, but this year shoppers did not buy so many shrimps from retailers, the discrepancy exist because---------------. 39. the mosquitos of the united states infected the dengue fever will infect people when the persons are bited by them( similar to the cause of a dengue disease in guangzhou, china!), and when the rain is in abundance, mosquito will proliferate very fast, but this year the united states rained often, incidence rate was much lower than expected. why? because many infectors did not appear the symptoms temporarily. 40. a company manager plans to boost its sales immediately, he asks his salesman to extend his customers, as a result, the salesman brought a lot of customers, but the sales does not increase, why ? because the customers extended by the salesman are those who want to solve the products problem which they bought from this company before. 41. american beef and brazil [版本1]巴西的牛数比美国的多.是其两杯,但美国产的牛肉比巴西多一倍,问解释:我选因为美国的牛肥 [版本2]巴西的牛是美国的2倍还是一样多忘了,但是美国的牛肉产量(好像用了吨这个词)是巴西的2倍,问原因,我选美国发达的科学技术让牛长的比巴西的胖 [版本3]my key:technique 让美国牛的肉张的快 42. A国,地产rice一直正好能自给自足, 但且预期人口将在今后几年有大幅增长,且A国的ric种植面积无变化,且亩产也没变,=>A将要开始进口rice了. 问假设? 个人选了A. A国的人均RICE consumption不会下降
46. 说人们不敢在网上购物,所以互联网公司提供给他们特殊的密码。问假设。一个选项说人们可以。。我觉得是个陷阱。因为人们怕不安全是关键。所以我选了,可以让人们了解到这个密码不会被黑客用来在购物,用了两个No, not 来表示使人们知道是安全的。 [编者评论]我在机考现场也遇到这题,好像是问如果公司计划成功必须要让顾客知道什么。楼上的答案应该是正确的。
补充一道题来表示支持。多些辛勤总结 第17题的另一个版本: President just vetoed congress's proposal for high way project. Since 90% of such project came from the opposite party controlled district, the opposite party thought that the president's decision is partisan biased. But a non-partisan editor reported that data showed such project is a big waste. Therefore, the president's decision must be benefitial to the nation, not partisanal biased. Assumption?
The district controlled by the president's party doesn't have higher cost on the same expense. the opposite party doesn't think the editor is non-partisan.