以下是引用追逐梦想2006在2006-3-18 1:41:00的发言:GWD17-40 Contrary to financial analysts, who predicted last year that the market for home computers would dwindle, the personal computer industry continued to show strong growth in the first quarter of this year.
- analysts, who predicted
- analysts, whose predictions
- analysts and their predictions
- analysts’ predicting
- analysts’ predictions
答案选E preditions last year that 我总觉得last year 位置比较奇怪,last year好像是一个副词性,可以直接修饰名词prediction吗?
比较A和E
A: Contrary to financial analysts, who predicted last year that ..., the personal computer industry continued to ...
E: Contrary to financial analysts' predictions last year that ..., the personal computer industry continued to ...
个人观点:主句主语是the personal computer industry,那么contrary to应该搭配financial analysts' predictions;“修饰”属于想当灵活的考点,一般来说不好用来做排除的理由。
以下是引用追逐梦想2006在2006-3-18 1:41:00的发言:GWD17-14 Whereas lines of competition are clearly defined in the more established industries, in the Internet industry they are blurred and indistinct, as companies that compete one day may be partners the next.
- Whereas lines of competition are clearly defined in the more established industries, in the Internet industry they are blurred and indistinct, as companies that compete
- Although the lines of competition are clearly defined in industries that are more established, they are blurred and indistinct in the Internet industry, as competing companies
这题有争议,我选A,排除B的理由也是one day 和the next 如果是B的话, competing companies one day may be partners the next 就是名词+副词 感觉和上面一题有点类似,还请大家指导指导!
个人看法:我觉得 in the Internet industry的位置的不同造成B中的they有指代industries的嫌疑,而A中 in the Internet industry在they之前,因此they不可能指代industries.
另外,B中的that are属于累赘,在OG的偏好之外;但是注意,此点绝对不能用来作为排除的理由,例外还是不只有一个的,具体举不出来。
-------
楼主啊,不知道你对tonyadidas的SC总结研究的如何?我觉得实在是太经典了,我觉得甚至连总结的顺序都和考点频率一致;后来我用tony的sc总结作为框架,自己把复习中遇到的情景加进去,最后应该说理解了tony总结的80-90%。
传一个我最后的以tony总结为框架的我的总结,你参考一下这种感觉:
对了,晚上不要太迟休息啦,作息有规律对身体好啊,复习状态也容易有规律些
[此贴子已经被作者于2006-3-18 2:07:48编辑过] |