ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: sbbi
打印 上一主题 下一主题

BF terms?

[精华] [复制链接]
11#
发表于 2003-9-16 11:23:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用fyhllj在2003-9-16 10:14:00的发言:
consideration是在作决定时必须要考虑的。
evidence是对你的决定进行支持。
举个例子:
决定去读MBA。
读MBA的投资是否值得?
读MBA可以挣大钱。
第一个就是consideration,而第二个是evidience.

希望解释清楚了。



这个清楚了.那么principle, and fact呢?

谢谢.
12#
发表于 2003-9-16 12:18:00 | 只看该作者
principle是一种原则,你必须遵守。通常是好的规律。没有时间上的分别,通常用现在时。
fact是一件已经发生的事情,不可能是将来的。我只能评价,研究和分析它。
BF题中是有这样的区分的,但是不难区分。
希望表达清楚了
13#
发表于 2003-9-17 03:52:00 | 只看该作者

请教BF中

What is : pre-evidence? what's: pre-premise? What's the difference between these two?
Thx
14#
发表于 2005-10-18 21:12:00 | 只看该作者

i think,:)


consideration是考虑问题该关注的因素(主要从这方面考虑而不是那个因素的影响),


princile 评价衡量的标准,抽象的规律原则,critiria,


fact(我理解fact为一种事实,客观存在的有形的事物或状况) 是evidence的一种。evidence 还可以是一种逻辑推理关系,(A>B,B>C)


15#
发表于 2005-10-18 21:41:00 | 只看该作者

p.s 我认为


consideration 是premise类


princile 多用于做evidence


请指正
16#
发表于 2005-11-1 23:17:00 | 只看该作者

请问nn, boldface中第二题 b选项的anti-consideration是什么意思啊?


2. A double-blind study, in which neither the patient nor the primary researcher knows whether the patient is being given the drug being tested or a placebo, is the most effective procedure for testing the efficacy of a drug. But we will not be able to perform such a study on this new drug, since the drug will have various effects on the patients’ bodies, which will make us aware of whether the patients are getting the drug or a placebo.


The two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?


(A) The first is a general consideration that introduces the argument; the second is a special situation that weighs against the first.


(B) The first is a general principle that is necessary for this argument; the second is an anti-consideration that the argument includes.


(C) The first is a premise that this argument includes; the second is a main idea that can be drawn from this argument.


(D) The first is an evidence that this argument includes; the second is a conclusion that can not be drawn from this argument.


(E) The first is a general situation that supports this argument; the second is a conclusion that can be drawn from a special fact.


17#
发表于 2006-2-18 10:19:00 | 只看该作者

同问

18#
发表于 2006-2-28 23:55:00 | 只看该作者
up!
19#
发表于 2006-4-17 11:02:00 | 只看该作者

A double-blind study, in which neither the patient nor the primary researcher knows whether the patient is being given the drug being tested or a placebo, is the most effective procedure for testing the efficacy of a drug.这段解释了什么是双盲试验,也就是一般药品临床检测时遵循的检测原则。principle


这个双盲试验中要考虑很多的因素,consideration比如病人情况,药品状况,生理情况,试验环境等等


But we will not be able to perform such a study on this new drug, since the drug will have various effects on the patients’ bodies, which will make us aware of whether the patients are getting the drug or a placebo.


这里讲了这个破药,对病人有很多不同的反应,让人一看就能观察出病人是吃了药还是没吃,如果一眼就能看出吃了药还是吃了安慰剂,那么双盲试验就没意义了。所以这里体现了药品的状况,且这药品状况是和原先的计划的要求相抵触的所以是 anti-consideration。

20#
发表于 2006-4-17 11:04:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用laure在2005-10-18 21:12:00的发言:

i think,:)


consideration是考虑问题该关注的因素(主要从这方面考虑而不是那个因素的影响),


princile 评价衡量的标准,抽象的规律原则,critiria,


fact(我理解fact为一种事实,客观存在的有形的事物或状况) 是evidence的一种。evidence 还可以是一种逻辑推理关系,(A>B,B>C)



我觉的这是正解~~~

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-13 08:42
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部