gwd 29-29

lichabrend

up

freedomzhx

能把我逼疯！！

guogo

C中compared to previously $7 per year, 7 per year是一个名词短语，previously是副词，副词不能修饰名词短语

tracycy2007

thank you

JamesYi

以下是引用gavinzhyh在2006-11-7 17:58:00的发言：

支持选D

C，the previously $7副词修饰名词错；

正解。

B中for wich was paid 7$ 定语从句还夹着倒装，怎么看怎么别扭

jiaojiao1426

以下是引用chamcham在2007-6-19 17:20:00的发言：

B:

 1，用被动，使得动作的发出者不明。

2，句式上的不对称没有明显的表现出前后的对比。

3，which优先指代cost，但实际上which指代higher education会更简洁明确一些

4. if using conversed order, not necessary ($7 per year was paid for the cost); otherwise no subject in relative clause.

C:

1. previously should be previous since modify noun phrase

2. compare to: A and B are not same thing; compare with: A and B are same thing, so should be compare with

So D

which 优先指代cost是怎么回事情呢？

xiaoniuren

up

yangxuandudu

up

jackieli007

~~

linjeedy

以下是引用gavinzhyh在2006/11/7 17:58:00的发言：

支持选D

E，contribute for不符合contribute的习惯用法；
                    

contribute / Longman:

1. intransitive

1) contribute to something

City employees cannot contribute to political campaigns.

2) contribute X to/toward Y

The volunteers contribute their own time to the project.

2. transitive

contribute something

A，伴随结果表达过去事件错；
                    

B，1) 没有动作的agent；2) X pay $7 for the education的被动形式应该是$7 was paid for the educaton，因此B为for which $7 was paid更好；
                    

pay ./ Longman

pay for sth

pay somebody for something

pay money for something

C，the previously $7副词修饰名词错；
                    

个人愚见选D，从错误级别看，E/C不符合习惯用法，B，被动语态的agent错误，应该首先排除；A，chronicle error比D的instead of比较对象不清晰更严重；并且D可以根据contribute money…instead of money的形式，以及逻辑判断是money的比较。

*welcome bricks*

超赞！！！