2006北美考G小组

可怜的蛋糕

以下是引用yangao在2005-12-31 5:18:00的发言：

11OG不在手边，等我回家看了题就贴出来。二楼加的任务，一个section是几个题？一个section规定多久完成？

一周一个section/test，一般25题/section

可怜的蛋糕

新年到了，祝愿各位新年快乐，在新的一年里心想事成！

我们的小组学习应该正式开始了吧？！愿意一起努力的人请跟帖，帖上请列出以下情况

1。预计考试日期 分数目标

2。目前进度

3。下阶段学习计划

4。弱项

5。使用材料

列以上资料的目的是希望大家能找到与自己进度相近的考友一起努力，互相监督。

先说我自己：

预计考试日期2月15日，还没有报名，分数目标700+。

目前进度OG SC CR完成了2遍，第一遍做题，第二遍看解释，其实也就跟人家的一遍一样，只是对于那些题目有了一些概念而已。OGRC第一遍才做到一半，错误率大大的，惨不忍睹。数学，费费的做完了，XDF的稍微做了点。大全的SC和CR做了一点点，属于探测性的做做看。作文没看。

下阶段我的重点还是OG,计划总结语法点，学习菜鸟，画一张自己的表格，逻辑按照lawyer的分类总结。阅读按照小安的方法做。开始搜集作文相关材料等，对作文有个初步印象。数学每天有时间练一点做个20题左右，免得到时候手忙脚乱。

我的弱点在阅读，那是我心中永远的痛啊，以前考6级的时候就发现了。阅读速度很慢，理解有问题。可能也跟我的词汇量不够有关。绝对需要加强的。

我的材料几乎都是从CD上下载的。VERBAL 就用OG GWD,OG 我用的是10TH,有时间再做点大全，不想全部做完，只当是练练笔。MATH用OG 费费 GWD  JJ

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-1-1 1:18:20编辑过]

shamoguzhou

NY,初步计划2月底考。互相监督。Msn:crackgmat@hotmail.com

我才刚开始，说说我得计划。

只看了刘振民语法。下面全面进入og。

每天：

一个section SC和CR，然后分析答案；阅读每天读3篇；1个小时数学（这个自己也不强，所以不敢掉以轻心）

作文还没有准备，正在找模版 。

我的计划不知道合适不？我得阅读也很是不好。楼上，我们互相监督吧。

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-1-1 0:51:29编辑过]

shamoguzhou

蛋糕，你说你的词汇量不够，那你有没有每天抽出时间背单词啊？我也这方面有问题的。就是偶尔睡觉前听听老俞的词汇。也不知道行不行？懒散啊，所以需要严重监督。

可怜的蛋糕

总结工作真累啊！今天早起，做了一些sc总结，结果，一个小时才总结了10题。然后跟前辈NN们的总结对照一下，发现自己还是有很多没有看出来，真逊！

TO shamoguzhou 我没有专门安排时间背单词，因为我没来由地恨死背单词了，所以就是特别注意做题目的时候的生词，尽量都弄明白，以至于做题速度很慢。记性又不好，经常同一个词查好几遍字典，下次看到还是不知道。

shamoguzhou

蛋糕，你通常早上几点起床，看来我真是太懒了。今天估计要请假了，我早上去唐人街买菜了，下午要和朋友一起出去吃饭。我今天本来要把刘振民那本搞定的。蛋糕，加油，你很棒啊。过了这两天，我一定早起，说到做到，监督我。BTW，你的SC怎么总结的，就是觉得是考同一知识点的归到一起ma?

可怜的蛋糕

蛋糕今天可惨了，为了弄明白一道题，脑子都快成浆糊了。OG10TH  171题，看完了CD上关于这题的所有解释，还是一团糊糊，大家帮帮忙

171. A recent report determined that although only three percent of drivers on Maryland highways equipped their vehicles with radar detectors, thirty-three percent of all vehicles ticketed for exceeding the speed limit were equipped with them. Clearly, drivers who equip their vehicles with radar detectors are more likely to exceed the speed limit regularly than are drivers who do not.

The conclusion drawn above depends on which of the following assumptions?

(A) Drivers who equip their vehicles with radar detectors are less likely to be ticketed for exceeding the speed limit than are drivers who do not.

(B) Drivers who are ticketed for exceeding the speed limit are more likely to exceed the speed limit regularly than are drivers who are not ticketed.

(C) The number of vehicles that were ticketed for exceeding the speed limit was greater than the number of vehicles that were equipped with radar detectors.

(D) Many of the vehicles that were ticketed for exceeding the speed limit were ticketed more than once in the time period covered by the report. B

(E) Drivers on Maryland highways exceeded the speed limit more often than did drivers on other state highways not covered in the report.

171.

The conclusion concerns regularly exceeding the speed limit, but the data derive from isolated occasions when drivers exceed the speed limit and are ticketed. The conclusion thus assumes that these instances provide evidence of regular behavior-that drivers ticketed for exceeding the speed limit are likely to be drivers who regularly exceed it. Choice B states this assumption and is the best answer.

Choices A, C, and D provide additional data that might be relevant to the conclusion, but if choice B is assumed, the additional data are unnecessary for drawing the conclusion. The difference that choice E describes between Maryland and other states would simply suggest that  the report’s findings cannot be extrapolated to other states. It does not help in drawing the conclusion.

yangao

11th OG DS 89

If 。represents one of the operations +,-,and *, is k。(L+m)=(k。L)+(k。m) for all numbers k,L,and m？

(1)k。1 is not equal to 1。k for some number k.

(2) 。represents subtraction.

The correct answer is D

(1)For operations + and -, k。1 is equal to 1。k   since both k+1=1+k and also k-1=1-k. Therefore, the operation represented must be subtration. From this , It is possible to determine whether k-(L+m)=(k-L)+(k-m) holds for all numbers k,L,and m; sufficient.

(2)The information is given directly that the operation represented is subtration. Once again, it can be determined whether k-(L+m)=(k-L)+(k-m) holds for all numbers k,L, and m; sufficent.

我的问题是为什么k-1=1-k. 请教各位

yangao

以下是引用可怜的蛋糕在2006-1-2 12:38:00的发言：

蛋糕今天可惨了，为了弄明白一道题，脑子都快成浆糊了。OG10TH  171题，看完了CD上关于这题的所有解释，还是一团糊糊，大家帮帮忙

171. A recent report determined that although only three percent of drivers on Maryland highways equipped their vehicles with radar detectors, thirty-three percent of all vehicles ticketed for exceeding the speed limit were equipped with them. Clearly, drivers who equip their vehicles with radar detectors are more likely to exceed the speed limit regularly than are drivers who do not.

The conclusion drawn above depends on which of the following assumptions?

(A) Drivers who equip their vehicles with radar detectors are less likely to be ticketed for exceeding the speed limit than are drivers who do not.

(B) Drivers who are ticketed for exceeding the speed limit are more likely to exceed the speed limit regularly than are drivers who are not ticketed.

(C) The number of vehicles that were ticketed for exceeding the speed limit was greater than the number of vehicles that were equipped with radar detectors.

(D) Many of the vehicles that were ticketed for exceeding the speed limit were ticketed more than once in the time period covered by the report. B

(E) Drivers on Maryland highways exceeded the speed limit more often than did drivers on other state highways not covered in the report.

171.

The conclusion concerns regularly exceeding the speed limit, but the data derive from isolated occasions when drivers exceed the speed limit and are ticketed. The conclusion thus assumes that these instances provide evidence of regular behavior-that drivers ticketed for exceeding the speed limit are likely to be drivers who regularly exceed it. Choice B states this assumption and is the best answer.

Choices A, C, and D provide additional data that might be relevant to the conclusion, but if choice B is assumed, the additional data are unnecessary for drawing the conclusion. The difference that choice E describes between Maryland and other states would simply suggest that  the report’s findings cannot be extrapolated to other states. It does not help in drawing the conclusion.

蛋糕我看了这一题，自己选的时候能选对，但是我说不出来是什么道理，只是觉得你多读两边，读懂了题目就能凭感觉做出来。有个公式是

Evidence + Assumption=> Conclusion.用在这题上我觉得是这样的：

Evidence:讲事实

A recent report determined that although only three percent of drivers on Maryland highways equipped their vehicles with radar detectors, thirty-three percent of all vehicles ticketed for exceeding the speed limit were equipped with them

Assumption:事实里面隐藏的假设，但是这个假设是没有说出来的。

Drivers who are ticketed for exceeding the speed limit are more likely to exceed the speed limit regularly than are drivers who are not ticketed.

Conclusion:通过事实和假设一起可以得出结论。

Clearly, drivers who equip their vehicles with radar detectors are more likely to exceed the speed limit regularly than are drivers who do not.

beiwu

我来报道，二战，一战成绩不理想啊，二战的目标暂时还是要700+，

我想问一下，2006年的考试和2005年的考试是否差不多？资料还是手头语法，逻辑大全加OG和GWD吗？

作文的题库和原来不同吗？

stellaqin_cn@hotmail.com



暂订2月25日考，还没报名。