2006北美考G小组

可怜的蛋糕 · 发表于 2006-1-18 11:46:00

我的理解就是剩余的，剩下的部分

seasnow · 发表于 2006-1-18 14:16:00

光顾一下。

顺便说说，没有OG11th的兄弟姐妹可以去语法区看我的帖子。详见6楼。

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=23&id=147602&star=1#147602

rosmarine · 发表于 2006-1-18 17:03:00

balance在会计里就是余额的意思。你拿到银行对账单的时候会看到每月余额的那栏就是写着balance多少多少

追逐梦想2006 · 发表于 2006-1-18 18:31:00

balance的意思比较多，同意蛋糕的解释，for the balance是剩余 = the rest的意思。记得balance还有一个考点，就是balance A against B，好像是平衡、均衡的意思。

shamoguzhou · 发表于 2006-1-19 05:02:00

哦,终于明白了.谢谢各位了。感觉做每一题都那么难啊。看不到做题方法，看不到规律。甚至连题意都理解不了——估计这是关键吧。

shamoguzhou · 发表于 2006-1-19 05:16:00

129. The pharmaceutical industry argues that because new drugs will not be developed unless

heavy development costs can be recouped in later sales, the current 20 years of protection

provided by patents should be extended in the case of newly developed drugs. However, in

other industries new-product development continues despite high development costs, a fact

that indicates that the extension is unnecessary.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the pharmaceutical industry's

argument against the challenge made above?

(A) No industries other than the pharmaceutical industry have asked for an extension of the

20-year limit on patent protection.

(B) Clinical trials of new drugs, which occur after the patent is granted and before the new

drug can be marketed, often now take as long as 10 years to complete.

(C) There are several industries in which the ratio of research and development costs to

revenues is higher than it is in the pharmaceutical industry.

(D) An existing patent for a drug does not legally prevent pharmaceutical companies from

bringing to market alternative drugs, provided they are sufficiently dissimilar to the

patented drug.

(E) Much recent industrial innovation has occurred in products---for example, in the

computer and electronics industries---for which patent protection is often very ineffective.

大家莫讨厌我啊！我在逻辑区实在查不出来，只好麻烦各位了。问题是问支持P工业的观点（蓝色），我想此文的后半部分是不是根本就不用考虑？就是问题问的与however后面毫无关系是吗？是不是他说20年的专利需要再延续。而b就是说临床试验就花去10年。就这样就加强了，对吗？

可怜的蛋糕 · 发表于 2006-1-19 10:17:00

我觉得HOWEVER后面的内容还是应该重视的，因为，制药业提出要延长专利期限的原因，与其他行业比应该是有其本身行业的特殊性的。（其他行业没有这个要求）。对于其他行业，20年的专利期限足以收回开发成本，但是，制药也不够，正如B所述，中间还有10年被用于临床试验，就是说只有10年的时间赚钱，可能还不够收回成本。所以，B加强了结论。A.C D E都没有体现出特殊性来。

今天终于完成了og 的阅读，这才是第一遍。有点虎头蛇尾，前几篇做完还都分析一遍，后面的不行了。做完就看一下错题就过了。统计最后的成绩，错了96题，正确率189/285=66%。这个几乎是我所有题目的正确率，真是奇怪。语法，逻辑都一样。学前学后都一样，区别就在于，系统学习前，很多都是猜的，讲不出道理。学了以后，能讲出道理来了，错的居然还是一样多，题目不同了而已。

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-1-19 10:20:47编辑过]