一头雾水：Ivey和 Queen's的Financial Times 2005排名

easybears

刚刚读了Financial Times 2005 MBA ranking, 令人大跌眼镜

queen's 竟然排到75！！ivey 34 ！

尤其是queen's ,去年还是大红大紫，怎么现在得到这样的名次，真是一头雾水。虽说这只是许多排名的一种，但这个排名也可能反映了这两所学校的一些不利的现状。请问大家对此的看法，谈谈它们下滑的主要原因。

正在申请当中，很喜欢queens and ivey , 请给一些信心和信息

dcc617

seldom听说QUEENS商科强,加拿大商学院三巨头是rotman, schulich and richard ivey,这三个学校大约排在30-40,下来才轮到UBC,QUEEN AND MCGILL,这些都60之后了

easybears

last year queen's ranked #1ahead of ivey and rotman in top 10 non-US b-schools(business weekly 2004).

I doubt the credibility of Financial Times' ranking 2005, because it's funny that a mainland b-school is ahead of ivey.

I don't believe queens is sliding down so exaggeratedly.

p200002

FT ranking is B.S.

sean1255

well, both schools are not that great. if you really strong, then go to the states. otherwise, taking a mba in china is much better than coming to canada. both schools will continue dropping in the ranking game for sure.