ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 741|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD 21-41

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-11-19 05:15:00 | 只看该作者

GWD 21-41

GWD 21-41


The Environmental Protection Agency’s proposal to place restrictions on both diesel fuel and diesel engines has sparked a counterattack by the oil industry, saying that the move will exacerbate the nation’s fuel supply problems.



A.     on both diesel fuel and diesel engines has sparked a counterattack by the oil industry, saying


B.     on both diesel fuel and engines have sparked the oil industry to counterattack, and they say


C.     on both diesel fuel and diesel engines has sparked a counterattack by the oil industry, which says


D.     both on diesel fuel and engines has sparked the oil industry to a counterattack, saying  (C)


E .  both on diesel fuel and diesel engines have sparked the oil industry to counterattack, and it says



oil industry可以做 says的主语吗?A里的saying的主语是不是指前面整个句子?我错选成A了。请教!

沙发
发表于 2005-11-19 22:01:00 | 只看该作者

say的发出者是oil industry


如果是用saying,则动作的发出者就变成了句子的主语The Environmental Protection Agency’s proposal 了。

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-11-20 00:17:00 | 只看该作者

哦,the move will应该是oil industry做主语比较好。


可是,怎么判定saying 是指代前面句子的主语,还是指代前面整个句子?

地板
发表于 2005-11-20 00:24:00 | 只看该作者

saying是个动词,怎么能“指代”呢?


你要考虑的是它的逻辑主语。


不能单凭形式来判断了。如果单纯从形式判断,saying、which says都可以,但是看内容就同了。

5#
发表于 2005-11-20 13:37:00 | 只看该作者
楼上说的没错 逻辑意思是最终目标
6#
发表于 2009-7-15 16:58:00 | 只看该作者

现在分词放在句尾,修饰对象会引起歧义,可以是修饰就近名词,也可以作为伴随状语修饰整个句子。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-2 06:31
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部