ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4126|回复: 11
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD18-3

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-11-16 05:22:00 | 只看该作者

GWD18-3

Q3 to Q5:


      The idea that equipping homes


       with electrical appliances and other


       “modern” household technologies


Line       would eliminate drudgery, save labor


  (5)       time, and increase leisure for women


who were full-time home workers


remained largely unchallenged until


the women’s movement of the 1970’s


spawned the groundbreaking and


(10)      influential works of sociologist Joann


Vanek and historian Ruth Cowan.


Vanek analyzed 40 years of time-


use surveys conducted by home


economists to argue that electrical


(15)      appliances and other modern house-


hold technologies reduced the effort


required to perform specific tasks,


but ownership of these appliances did


not correlate with less time spent on


(20)      housework by full-time home workers.


       In fact, time spent by these workers


       remained remarkably constant―at


about 52 to 54 hours per week―from


the 1920’s to the 1960’s, a period


(25)      of significant change in household


technology.  In surveying two


centuries of household technology


in the United States, Cowan argued


that the “industrialization” of the home


(30)      often resulted in more work for full-time


home workers because the use of


such devices as coal stoves, water


       pumps, and vacuum cleaners tended


to reduce the workload of married-


(35)     women’s helpers (husbands, sons,


daughters, and servants) while


promoting a more rigorous standard


of housework.  The full-time home


worker’s duties also shifted to include


(40)      more household management, child


care, and the post-Second World War


phenomenon of being “Mom’s taxi.”


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Q3:


According to the passage, which of the following is true about the idea mentioned in line 1?


              



  • It has been undermined by data found in time-use surveys conducted by home economists.

  • It was based on a definition of housework that was explicitly rejected by Vanek and Cowan.

  • It is more valid for the time period studied by Cowan than for the time period studied by Vanek.

  • It is based on an underestimation of the time that married women spent on housework prior to the industrialization of the household.

  • It inaccurately suggested that new household technologies would reduce the effort required to perform housework.

  • Answer:


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Q4:


    The passage is primarily concerned with


                  



  • analyzing a debate between two scholars

  • challenging the evidence on which a new theory is based

  • describing how certain scholars’ work countered a prevailing view

  • presenting the research used to support a traditional theory

  • evaluating the methodology used to study a particular issue

  • Answer:


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Q5:


    Which of the following best describes the function of the sentence in lines 21-26 (“In fact, time … in household technology”)?


                  



  • It offers an alternative interpretation of a phenomenon described in the previous sentence (lines 12-20).

  • It provides the specific evidence on which an argument described in the previous sentence (lines 12-20) is based.

  • It shifts the focus of the argument developed earlier in the passage.

  • It introduces evidence that has not been taken into account by Vanek and Cowan.

  • It introduces a topic for discussion that will be developed in the rest of the passage.

  • 请问第三题中A,E哪一个比较好?

    沙发
    发表于 2005-11-19 00:56:00 | 只看该作者

    A



    analyzed 40 years of time-


    use surveys conducted by home


    economists to argue that electrical


    (15)      appliances and other modern house-


    hold technologies reduced the effort


    required to perform specific tasks,


    but ownership of these appliances did


    not correlate with less time spent on


    (20)      housework by full-time home workers.


           In fact, time spent by these workers


           remained remarkably constant


    板凳
    发表于 2005-12-1 06:33:00 | 只看该作者
    E为什么不行?
    地板
    发表于 2005-12-12 11:54:00 | 只看该作者
    第三题,reduce the effort of housework 是对的,在第15行开始,反对的意见是没有reduce the time of house work 但是的确reduced the effort of the house work . so E It inaccurately suggested that new household technologies would reduce the effort required to perform housework 是不对的
    5#
    发表于 2006-5-19 12:29:00 | 只看该作者
    我觉得E好.
    6#
    发表于 2006-7-27 18:24:00 | 只看该作者
    以下是引用amber0919在2006-5-19 12:29:00的发言:
    我觉得E好.

    It inaccurately suggested that new household technologies would reduce the effort required to perform housework

    文章说确实减轻effort了,只是没有减轻时间而已

    7#
    发表于 2006-10-15 19:16:00 | 只看该作者
    ...
    8#
    发表于 2006-11-9 18:43:00 | 只看该作者

    E是不对的

    Vanek analyzed 40 years of time-
    use surveys conducted by home
    economists to argue that electrical
     (15) appliances and other modern house-
    hold technologies reduced the effort
    required to perform specific tasks,
    but ownership of these appliances did
    not correlate with less time spent on
     (20) housework by full-time home workers.

    9#
    发表于 2007-8-21 11:56:00 | 只看该作者
    ??
    10#
    发表于 2007-10-14 11:27:00 | 只看该作者

    到底问的是第几题?

    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-28 09:43
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部