ChaseDream
搜索
12345
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: titatita
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[SC总结] enough to 与 so as to、so that 的区别 强烈要求nn拍砖

[精华] [复制链接]
41#
发表于 2011-5-7 17:26:52 | 只看该作者
谢谢总结。其实enough只有在和so that,so...as,such...that混用的时候才是错误答案的标志,做形容词修饰名词,做副词修饰形容词后加不定式都是正确的用法
42#
发表于 2012-2-22 23:13:13 | 只看该作者
看的我还是有点纠结啊啊啊
so....as to 和so as to 到底是怎么回事
求NN们指教啊!
43#
发表于 2012-2-22 23:13:29 | 只看该作者
好老的帖子了 顶顶吧~
44#
发表于 2012-4-29 18:39:47 | 只看该作者
呵呵,我被OG 100 their apparent position do not change enough for their movement to be observed during a single human lifetime 纠结到这里了。
45#
发表于 2013-11-3 07:12:58 | 只看该作者
只能说比较同意32楼的观点,主语虽然一致,但是要找最佳选项
46#
发表于 2018-9-3 21:54:45 | 只看该作者
做到一题,供参考吧:
The category 1 to 5 rating known as the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Scale provides an estimate
of a hurricane’s potential of destroying or damaging property, and is primarily determined from
wind speed; a category 5 storm has wind speeds so high as to blow away small buildings,
completely destroy mobile homes, and cause severe window and door damage.
• of destroying or damaging property, and is primarily determined from wind speed; a category
5 storm has wind speeds so high as
• to destroy or damage property, and is primarily determined from wind speed; a category 5
storm has wind speeds high enough
• of destroying or damaging property, and is primarily determined by wind speed; a category 5
storm has wind speeds so high as
• to destroy or damage property, and is primarily determined by wind speed; a category 5 storm
has wind speeds high enough
• to destroy or damage property, and is primarily determined by wind speed; a category 5 storm
has wind speeds so high as

答案选E
When referring to y as the potential outcome of x, the correct idiom is “x’s potential to
y.” This sentence incorrectly phrases the idiom as “a hurricane’s potential of
destroying or damaging.” When referring to the use of y to determine x, the correct
idiom is “x is determined by y.” This sentence incorrectly phrases the idiom as
“potential … is determined from wind speeds.” Finally, there is a subtle distinction
between the idiom "so x as to y" and “x is enough to y.”
The original sentence uses
the idiom "so x as to y" to indicate that characteristic x is so extreme in the particular
case that y results. In contrast, the idiom "x is enough to y" is used when x is the
criteria by which an ability to achieve y is measured. Thus, if a sentence stated that "a
category 5 storm has wind speeds high enough to blow away small buildings," this
would convey a different meaning: that wind speeds are the criteria by which one
measures the ability to blow away small houses.
(A) This choice is incorrect as it repeats the original sentence.
(B) When referring to the use of y to determine x, the correct idiom is “x is determined
by y.” This sentence incorrectly phrases the idiom as “potential … is determined from
wind speeds.” The change from the original idiom "wind speeds so high as to..." to the
idiom presented in this sentence “high enough to...” changes the original meaning of
the sentence; it conveys that wind speeds are the criteria by which one measures the
ability to blow away small houses. The idiom "so x as to y" is required instead to
match the original meaning: that characteristic x (the wind speed) is so extreme in the
particular case (a category 5 storm) that y results (small houses are blown away).
(C) When referring to y as the potential outcome of x, the correct idiom is “x’s
potential to y.” This sentence incorrectly phrases the idiom as “a hurricane’s potential
of destroying or damaging.”
(D) The idiom “high enough to blow away small buildings” changes the original
meaning; it conveys that wind speeds are the criteria by which one measures the
ability to blow away small houses. The idiom "so x as to y" is required instead to
match the original meaning: that characteristic x (the wind speed) is so extreme in the
particular case (a category 5 storm) that y results (small houses are blown away).
(E) CORRECT. All idioms in the sentence are used correctly.
47#
发表于 2019-7-26 09:07:49 | 只看该作者
结合前面各位大神的知识点,总结了一下子
so .. that/as to 表结果(但是如果as to后面的动词和主语之间逻辑关系正确,就应该选so...as to,因为相对于so...that简洁。)
so that/as to 表目的(so that 后要跟情态动词)
adj / v + enough to do 强调动作 (没有 enough as/so..)
such ...as to基本就是个错误选项了
选择so as to 还是 so...that (so that)主要取决前面的逻辑主语请不清楚,也就是说如果一个句子里面出现两个或两个以上的名词,就要考虑一下so as to 后面有没有主语指代不明。
因为that从句总是要求把主语写出来, 否则句子没有主语,就会犯句子无主语的低级错误,既然有了明确的主语, 谁为主句的目的发出相关动作就清楚无疑了.
(注:so that与so…that不同,前者是目的状语,后者是表结果的状语)
48#
发表于 2019-10-6 13:51:23 | 只看该作者
太难了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-25 22:31
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部