ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: 小白斩鸡
打印 上一主题 下一主题

揽瓜阁训练营 第九十九天(含CR,RC和DI题目)

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2024-4-5 18:50:00 | 只看该作者
DAY99
CR E(A) D (E)A C(A)
RC A(C) B E B (E)E E E(D) D
1-The mortgage interest income tax deduction事与愿违 带来负面影响
The mortgage interest income tax deduction抵押贷款利息所得税减免 tax code税法 ostensibly表面上externalities外部性perverse不合理的detrimental to对有害
2-One of the most glaring issues with the mortgage interest tax deduction is its inherent bias towards high-income earners.
skewed偏的 斜的 tax breaks税收优惠lower income tax liabilities较低的所得税负债
3-the deduction creates perverse incentives
emblematic 特征  
4-A more rational approach would be to replace the mortgage interest tax deduction with a Housing Tax Credit.
entail牵涉nominal 名义extravagant无节制的
5- Reforming the mortgage interest income tax deduction and implementing a more equitable and efficient Housing Tax Credit
grapples with努力应对imperative迫切的foresight远见head-on正面
12#
发表于 2024-4-5 21:09:33 | 只看该作者
cr1:p:Company B, designed a similar triangular bottle, but with a black and white label.
c:Company A did not file a lawsuit against Company B for infringement.
选A) Customers easily distinguish between the two products due to the color difference in the labels. 未对a造成侵权因为消费者可以轻易分清他们
2p:rewarding them based on the amount of weight lost.
c:the company's weight loss incentive program will lead to negative outcomes
选E. The company has a policy of penalizing employees who are found to be intentionally gaining weight. 同因反果,削弱
13#
发表于 2024-4-6 14:01:40 | 只看该作者
DAY99
CR
AD
RC
ABEEEEDD
- 抵押贷款利息的减少表面上好处,实际对富人有利,对国家经济不利
- 高低收入者的偏差在抵押贷款利息减少的体现,富人获益最多,实际穷人无获益
- 鼓励高收入者购买昂贵的房,获得更多的抵押贷款,加剧收入不平等
- 取代抵押贷款的是房屋税贷款,好处
- 下一届政府需要创造更公平更可持续的房屋市场和更繁荣的未来
14#
发表于 2024-4-6 15:17:23 | 只看该作者
000000000000000000
15#
发表于 2024-4-6 18:40:55 | 只看该作者
CR
AE

RC
CBEEEEDD
16#
发表于 2024-4-6 22:42:57 | 只看该作者
先对答案:

CR:E(A)D(E)AA
DI: DC(B)DCCDCCCA
RC:CBEB(E)EB(E)DD

17#
发表于 2024-4-7 06:40:18 | 只看该作者
Day 99
CR
support (explain) -  A
逻辑链:A has triangular bottle with gold label, B has similar bottle with black and white label – A did not sue
A和E不大确定
weaken - E
逻辑链:company reward employees for weight loss — employee gain then lose weight — negative incentive
A - 无关
B - 和标准无关
C - 增强
D - 与cost无关
E - 正确

RC
P1: mortgage interest income tax reduction may not good for the economy
P2: inherent bias towards high-income. The tax deduction is applied to one’s income.
P3: high income earners buy bigger house and take more mortgages, exacerbates income inequality and cause house price inflation
P4: replace it with housing tax credit, benefit lower income and reduce subsidies for rich people’s big houses. May aid in the housing crisis.
P5: Reform is needed
A(C)BEE EEDA(D)
18#
发表于 2024-4-7 17:50:15 | 只看该作者
CR

1. Support
选A,如果不影响销售利润,就没必要起诉

2. Weaken
选E,有办法可以监督,那就不会造成negative outcomes
19#
发表于 2024-4-7 20:22:11 | 只看该作者
RC
第1段:抵押贷款减税表面上有减少犯罪率和加强社区凝聚力的好处,但实际上更大程度地有利于富人,最终损害国家的经济。
第2段:最大的问题就是,抵押贷款减税和个人收入相关。收入越多,减税越大;收入越少,减税越小;没有房子则得不到任何补贴。
第3段:一个更合理的做法是,将抵押贷款减免的税务,平均分摊的各户人家,使各家各户收益相等。富人买贵房子得到的税务减免不会更多,穷人也会有更多的补贴去买房子。
第4段:房产税务改革很迫切,可以创造一个更好的未来。
A、B、E、E、E、E、D、C

CR
A公司的洗发水是三角瓶贴金色标签
B公司的洗发水是三角瓶贴黑白标签
但是A没有起诉B侵权
问原因
E:没有法律依据

一个公司计划通过奖励减重的员工来减少医疗保险的费用
但是有人担心这个活动可能有负面影响,即员工会先增重再减重
问削弱
D:员工先增重再减重的成本比活动的奖励更高
20#
发表于 2024-4-7 20:22:20 | 只看该作者
Mark一下!               
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-9 01:58
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部