ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2268|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

CR讨论!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-9-5 16:24:00 | 只看该作者

CR讨论!

“砖头”p197 第86:
government-subsidized insurance available to homeowners makes it feasible for anyone to build a house on a section of coastline regularly struck by hurricanes. each major storm causes billions of dollars worth of damage in such coastal areas, after which owners who have insurance are able to collect an amount of money sufficient to recoup a high % of their loss.
the passage provides the most support for an argument against a government bill proposing
e. establishment of a contingency fund protecting owners of uninsured houses inthe coastal areas fm catastrophic losses due to the hurricane damage.
答案就是e。我的理解是:政府应该着力保护insured house owners.而不是uninsured ...
可是我看了后面的解释:政府补贴的保险项目是为了保护海边地区的户主们的意外灾难性损失,因此要反对政府补贴的保险项目,就是要找出一个另一个课题患的能保护沿海地区户主利益的办法,五个选项里只有e是针对户主利益而提出的,所以e。
我觉得解释的粗体部分不对,大家来讨论一下,问题到底是什么意思。(我得理解是:上面的段落为以下哪一个政府提议建立了最强的反对?)你们的理解呢?、??
沙发
发表于 2003-9-5 21:34:00 | 只看该作者
the question is about information to agaist the propose provide in the passage.

passage tell us that people can use insurance to protect their loss

choice tell us that govenment should set up a contigency fund, a propose that is agaist the passage.
板凳
发表于 2003-9-6 04:46:00 | 只看该作者
这到题的关键是after which owners who have insurance ,造成了另一类人,owners of uninsured houses 无着罗。资本主义也讲人道,所以E 选项AGAINST 的方法不是指出GOVERNMENT 'S PROPOSAL 的缺陷,而是提出了保护owners of uninsured houses 的措施
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-22 17:57
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部