[揽瓜阁逻辑小分队] day87

F_Hillary

Day 87
1.        增长的酒店税收
Tourists have long complained that hotel accommodations in Midville are too expensive.  Starting last year, the city council, hoping to attract more tourists, lowered the hotel tax rate to 5 percent of room charges.  By the end of last year, Midville had taken in no less money from hotel taxes than it did the year before, so an examination of the hotel records will show that more tourists stayed in city hotels last year than the year before.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. The tourists who stayed in Midville hotels last year were aware that the hotel tax rate had been lowered.
B. The average price of hotel accommodations in Midville was not significantly higher than in hotels in other cities either last year or the year before.
C. The average length of a tourist’s stay in Midville hotels was not longer last year than it had been the year before.
D. There were significantly more efforts to publicize Midville as a tourist destination last year than there had been the year before.
E. On average, tourists in Midville did not spend significantly more on meals last year than they did on hotels accommodations.
C
2.        洞穴鱼和猫头鹰
政府投资10000刀（可能不准）保护一种要灭绝的鱼（cave fish），但是投资2000000刀给一种猫头鹰，然而这个猫头鹰的数量并不少，远远不至于灭绝，然后呢就有人批评政府说：你这个保护cave鱼的措施effort投入太少啦~~
题目是削弱
My answer：因为一些原因，保护要灭绝的鱼的成本远远低于保护猫头鹰的成本


3.        官员和媒体的恶战
Corruption, 有两个国家，L和K，L的public awareness of corruption is better than nation K,但国家L的corruption却更多，最后得出结论是应该归咎于L的媒体，问支持,
有点疑惑：归咎于L的媒体什么？
L媒体错误报道？
备选答案：记者为了能够挖出真相，所以对政府实际的情况 biased 了

EasonZHAO

Day 87
1.        增长的酒店税收
Tourists have long complained that hotel accommodations in Midville are too expensive.  Starting last year, the city council, hoping to attract more tourists, lowered the hotel tax rate to 5 percent of room charges.  By the end of last year, Midville had taken in no less money from hotel taxes than it did the year before, so an examination of the hotel records will show that more tourists stayed in city hotels last year than the year before.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. The tourists who stayed in Midville hotels last year were aware that the hotel tax rate had been lowered.
B. The average price of hotel accommodations in Midville was not significantly higher than in hotels in other cities either last year or the year before.
C. The average length of a tourist’s stay in Midville hotels was not longer last year than it had been the year before.
D. There were significantly more efforts to publicize Midville as a tourist destination last year than there had been the year before.
E. On average, tourists in Midville did not spend significantly more on meals last year than they did on hotels accommodations.

2.        洞穴鱼和猫头鹰
政府投资10000刀（可能不准）保护一种要灭绝的鱼（cave fish），但是投资2000000刀给一种猫头鹰，然而这个猫头鹰的数量并不少，远远不至于灭绝，然后呢就有人批评政府说：你这个保护cave鱼的措施effort投入太少啦~~
题目是削弱：cave fish快灭绝的主要原因是因为一种老鼠肆虐，这种老鼠猎食cave fish，猫头鹰以这种老鼠为主要食物
3.        官员和媒体的恶战
Corruption, 有两个国家，L和K，L的public awareness of corruption is better than nation K,但国家L的corruption却更多，最后得出结论是应该归咎与L的媒体，问支持,             答的媒体对该国的corruption是有失公正的

PennyWen95

看一下！               

PennyWen95

[揽瓜阁逻辑小分队] day87
Day 87
1.        增长的酒店税收
Tourists have long complained that hotel accommodations in Midville are too expensive.  Starting last year, the city council, hoping to attract more tourists, lowered the hotel tax rate to 5 percent of room charges.  By the end of last year, Midville had taken in no less money from hotel taxes than it did the year before, so an examination of the hotel records will show that more tourists stayed in city hotels last year than the year before.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

C. The average length of a tourist’s stay in Midville hotels was no longer last year than it had been the year before.

2.        洞穴鱼和猫头鹰
政府投资10000刀（可能不准）保护一种要灭绝的鱼（cave fish），但是投资2000000刀给一种猫头鹰，然而这个猫头鹰的数量并不少，远远不至于灭绝，然后呢就有人批评政府说：你这个保护cave鱼的措施effort投入太少啦~~
题目是削弱
因为猫头鹰数量多，所以平均到每只猫头鹰上面的费用就会很少
cave鱼之所以灭绝是由于一种水污染，而政府投入的10000刀恰恰就是为了治理这种污染。

3.        官员和媒体的恶战
Corruption, 有两个国家，L和K，L的public awareness of corruption is better than nation K,但国家L的corruption却更多，最后得出结论是应该归咎与L的媒体，问支持,
虽然L的public awareness of corruption is better, 但是媒体的报道少，与官员勾结，调查困难重重
记者为了能够挖出真相，所以对政府实际的情况biased了

luzitao630

Tourists have long complained that hotel accommodations in Midville are too expensive.  Starting last year, the city council, hoping to attract more tourists, lowered the hotel tax rate to 5 percent of room charges.  By the end of last year, Midville had taken in no less money from hotel taxes than it did the year before, so an examination of the hotel records will show that more tourists stayed in city hotels last year than the year before.
P: 降低酒店税, 为了吸引游客来玩; P: 去年的的酒店税税收收入并没有比以往少; C: 得出了去年来酒店住的人增加
GAP: 绝对值和相对值; 百分比; 除了人数, 别的因素会不会导致酒店税税收收入提升
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends (条件论证)?
A. The tourists who stayed in Midville hotels last year were aware that the hotel tax rate had been lowered.-YES, EXACTLY, 只是降低税率后的结果, 并没有探讨人多没多
B. The average price of hotel accommodations in Midville was not significantly higher than in hotels in other cities either last year or the year before.-无关
C. The average length of a tourist’s stay in Midville hotels was not longer last year than it had been the year before.
酒店税税收收入=来的酒店住的人*单价*tax rate
人多了, 但是收入没减少
新的可能
住的人少了
酒店的税收收入=每晚的价格*入住时限*来酒店住的人*tax rate
入住时间长了, 哪怕来酒店住的人少了税收收入也会提升
D. There were significantly more efforts to publicize Midville as a tourist destination last year than there had been the year before.-不优
E. On average, tourists in Midville did not spend significantly more on meals last year than they did on hotels accommodations.-怎么花钱无关
政府投资10000刀 (可能不准) 保护一种要灭绝的鱼 (cave fish), 但是投资2000000刀给一种猫头鹰, 然而这个猫头鹰的数量并不少, 远远不至于灭绝, 然后呢就有人批评政府说: 你这个保护cave鱼的措施effort投入太少了
P: 10000刀的鱼的保护费少于2000000刀的猫头鹰保护费; P: 猫头鹰远远不至于灭绝; C: 政府对鱼的保护不够
GAP: 绝对值和相对值不能完全划等号
要思考何谓不够, 那就是比例不高
削弱问的是 (原因论证)
其实保护鱼不需要花很多的钱, 但是保护猫头鹰哪怕不是防止灭绝都需要很多钱
E.G. 平时政府在保护鱼上花费的总费用比如15000刀, 但是鱼就占了10000, 67%; 反过来比如猫头鹰需要的总费用是20000000刀, 猫头鹰只占了2000000, 10%. 所以, 政府评价不客观仅仅通过绝对数量
有两个国家, L和K, L的public awareness of corruption is better than nation K, 但国家L的corruption却更多, 最后得出结论是应该归咎与L的媒体
P: L人们比K更能意识到政府的腐败, 但是L国的贪污现象更多; C: 媒体的锅
说白了就是怎么将媒体报导的数量和贪腐数量划等号, 建立联系
SUPPORT (原因论证)
人民获取新闻的主要途径就是媒体, 媒体是客观中立的, 宣传报导上难以出现偏差-排除他因
媒体工作人员的知识水平很高, 不会想随便搞大新闻假新闻-反因反果+同因同果
-政府表现好, 媒体不搞大新闻
-政府表现差, 媒体也会搞事情