[揽瓜阁逻辑小分队] day87

Marvnt

同意！               

Marvnt

1.
P/果：降低税率，但是税收没变（收入增加）
C/因：旅客人数增加
排除他因：不是因为旅客住的时间更长了

2.
P/果：投资10000刀好虎鱼类，投资更多给猫头鹰，但猫头鹰的数量并不少
C：认为投入鱼的effort太少
削弱：类比削弱：鱼和猫头鹰间有不同的地方（例如鱼本身用少的价钱就可以保护的很好）

3.
P：L国对于corruption的意识/感觉要高于K，而L的corruption却更多
C：媒体不作为
果因推理：排除他因/说明逻辑道理

essie0415

87. (1)Tourists have long complained that hotel accommodations in Midville are too expensive. Starting last year, the city council, hoping to attract more tourists,
lowered the hotel tax rate to 5 percent of room charges. By the end of last year,
Midville had taken in no less money from hotel taxes than it did the year before,
so an examination of the hotel records will show that more tourists stayed in city hotels last year than the year before.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. The tourists who stayed in Midville hotels last year were aware that the hotel
tax rate had been lowered.
B. The average price of hotel accommodations in Midville was not significantly
higher than in hotels in other cities either last year or the year before.
C. The average length of a tourist’s stay in Midville hotels was not longer last
year than it had been the year before.
D. There were significantly more efforts to publicize Midville as a tourist destination last year than there had been the year before.
E. On average, tourists in Midville did not spend significantly more on meals last year than they did on hotels accommodations.

逻辑链：
每个房间降税5%，今年的税收没有比去年少（事实）——更多游客来住这家酒店了（推论）
assumption: 平均一个游客的住酒店时长没有变长

87.(2)政府投资10000保护一种快要灭绝的洞穴鱼，却投资2000000给数量并不少的猫头鹰，有人批评政府说投入太少了，问削弱
逻辑链：
政府给鱼投资相比猫头鹰少（事实）——政府投入太少了（推论）
削弱：政府投入的钱足够保护鱼，或者保护猫头鹰是从另一个方面去保护鱼，相当于整体上对鱼的投入并不少。

87.(3)
Corruption, 有两个国家，L 和 K，L 的 public awareness of corruption is better than
nation K,但国家 L 的 corruption 却更多，最后得出结论是应该归咎与 L 的媒体，问支持。
逻辑链：
L的公众认同好，但是L的官员腐败更多（事实）——L的媒体不好（推论）
找支持，即说出L媒体是帮助官员隐瞒的。

tomxeom1100

Mark一下！               

hyz0612

ark

abc1654

lastchance2010

感谢分享！               

lastchance2010

1.        增长的酒店税收
Tourists have long complained that hotel accommodations in Midville are too expensive.  Starting last year, the city council, hoping to attract more tourists, lowered the hotel tax rate to 5 percent of room charges.  By the end of last year, Midville had taken in no less money from hotel taxes than it did the year before, so an examination of the hotel records will show that more tourists stayed in city hotels last year than the year before.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends? C
A. The tourists who stayed in Midville hotels last year were aware that the hotel tax rate had been lowered.
B. The average price of hotel accommodations in Midville was not significantly higher than in hotels in other cities either last year or the year before.
C. The average length of a tourist’s stay in Midville hotels was not longer last year than it had been the year before.
D. There were significantly more efforts to publicize Midville as a tourist destination last year than there had been the year before.
E. On average, tourists in Midville did not spend significantly more on meals last year than they did on hotels accommodations.

2.        洞穴鱼和猫头鹰
政府投资10000刀（可能不准）保护一种要灭绝的鱼（cave fish），但是投资2000000刀给一种猫头鹰，然而这个猫头鹰的数量并不少，远远不至于灭绝，然后呢就有人批评政府说：你这个保护cave鱼的措施effort投入太少啦~~
题目是削弱
P-Little money for fish protection, and more money for owl C-efforts on fish protection are not enough
削弱-the money invested in fish is well can protect all of the cave fish effectively 或者猫头鹰能够干掉吃这些鱼的动物，猫头鹰的投资一样能保护鱼？

3.        官员和媒体的恶战
Corruption, 有两个国家，L和K，L的public awareness of corruption is better than nation K,但国家L的corruption却更多，最后得出结论是应该归咎与L的媒体，问支持,
P-K, L L’s public awareness of corruption is better than K but L experience more corruption; C-it is the media to blame for the corruption
支持国家的观点 – 那就是awareness 导致corruption?
因为总提corruption, 所以大家就去corrupt 么?

miawang00088

看一下！               

F_Hillary

看一下！