ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 872|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[逻辑小分队] 求解曼哈顿CR P114页中的一道逻辑题例题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2022-7-30 17:33:46 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
When news periodicals begin forecasting a recession, people tend to spend less money on nonessential purchases. Therefore, the perceived threat of a future recession decreases the willingness of people to purchase products that they regard as optional or luxury goods.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?


(A) People do not always agree as to which goods should be considered luxury goods.
(B) Many more people read news periodicals today than five years ago.
(C) Most people do not regularly read news periodicals.
(D) Decreased spending on nonessential goods does not prompt news
periodicals to forecast a recession.
(E) At least some of the biggest spending consumers prior to the recession were among those who curtailed their spending after the recession began.


本题问assumption,D选项曼哈顿的解释是这和argument的表达方式相反。即:D选项说:花费的减少不会导致新闻预测。而题目的argue是:新闻预测导致花费减少。 我觉得D选项意思上看是arguement的逆否命题,为什么可以作为原命题的assumption(假设)?求大佬给我解答,有些转不过来。
                                       
                                
                        
               


收藏收藏 收藏收藏
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-26 03:14
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部