|
以下是引用rex_zhang2002在2005-10-24 22:52:00的发言:
Actually, I agree with you guys and Wharton DEFINATELY has the worst MBA student quality among top schools. A show is a show, but factually, Wharton's student's pool is very poor. There is no doubt about that. Its reputation is still there, though. Fudan is a very competitive place and I am still missing there. In 1994 when I entered Fudan, we had to fight hard for all the tests and exams. I can still recollect those summers and Spring festivals when I spent time on campus reading, preparing and suffering for GRE and TOEFL. Our department (chemistry) had 138 students and only two students came to the States in 1998 immediately upon graduation (can't compare that with USTC or Beijing U, right?..:-), I went to Columbia and the girl went to UCLA. Frankly, I personally don't think Fudan is particularly good in terms of that, but it's certainly a place that I will never forget in my life, never and ever, no matter where I am, both in the US and in China. To answer the last question, I joined Merck immediately upon my Ph.D graduation from Columbia in 2003. thanks all CDers. Rex
hey, man~~~~you are totally unreasonable!
"Wharton DEFINATELY has the worst MBA student quality among top schools. A show is a show, but factually, Wharton's student's pool is very poor. "
----if so ,then tell me which school student has the quality in your measurement? if that be the case, why we still work so hard to strive MBA !!!!!????? Come on!!!!
I am not going to apply wharton yet,but still believe wharton students are excellent!!! If you don't think so, I assume you could be too perfect to go for MBA!!!!!! then give up your decision ,why wast time here? ( also for realize, )
back up for CICILLIA |