ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 6591|回复: 55
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[阅读小分队] 【揽瓜阁5.0】Day9 2021.02.16【自然科学-化学、天文、生物】

  [复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2021-2-15 22:43:56 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
  揽瓜阁俱乐部第五期
  Day9 2021.02.16



【自然科学-化学】
How to separate oxygen from air using magnets:If it works, this vital gas should become cheaper
( The Economist-706 字 长阅读)

Oxygen is vital. Literally so for breathing, and thus for many hospital patients. And metaphorically for industries ranging from steelmaking to pharmaceuticals, which use it in their processes. The world market for the gas is therefore large. Various estimates put it as having been between about $28bn and $49bn in 2019.

It could, though, be larger. In a set of reactions that also involve oxygen and steam, fossil fuels such as coal and natural gas can be turned into hydrogen, a source of energy, and carbon dioxide, which can be separated and sequestered underground. That might allow their continued employment in a world of restricted greenhouse-gas emissions. It would, however, require a cheap and abundant supply of oxygen. Which is why America’s Department of Energy is sponsoring a project intended to pull oxygen from the atmosphere with magnets.

Dry air is a mixture of 21% oxygen, 78% nitrogen and 1% argon, with a few other trace gases such as carbon dioxide. At the moment, most of the world’s pure oxygen is made by the liquefaction and subsequent distillation of air, to separate it into its components. This is done in large factories. The other source of oxygen, somewhat less pure, is small, mobile plants called oxygen concentrators. These either absorb the nitrogen into a porous substance called a zeolite, leaving behind a gas that is 90% oxygen, or force air through membranes more permeable to one gas than the other, yielding a somewhat less rich mixture. The alternative of magnetic separation is the brainchild of John Vetrovec, boss of Aqwest, a technology firm in Larkspur, Colorado.

Though oxygen cannot be magnetised permanently in the way that elements like iron can, it is attracted by magnetic fields. As a consequence, when air is pumped through such a field its oxygen gets concentrated in those places where the field is strongest. This concentration-enhancement is small. But if the oxygen-enriched part of the air stream could be separated from the oxygen-impoverished part, and then treated in the same way over and over again, it could be enriched to the point where it was pure enough to be useful. Dr Vetrovec thinks he knows how to do this.

A previous attempt by a different group of engineers used pulsed electromagnets. This, though, required both high pressure, which is expensive to create, and the electromagnets themselves, which are costly to buy and costly to run. Dr Vetrovec intends to perform his version of the trick at atmospheric pressure, and using permanent magnets. Both of these modifications greatly reduce power consumption. In fact, the device’s only moving part is the blower which pushes air through it.

It’s a gas
The magic extra ingredient Aqwest brings to the party is an array of structures called microchannels. These are tubes less than a millimetre in diameter that are intended to carry liquids or gases. Crucially, their narrow bores ensure the laminar flow of any fluid passing through them. Translated from physics-speak, this means they cause no turbulence, and therefore no mixing of their contents. That allows them to act as gas separators in the firm’s device.

On the face of things, the initial results do not look that impressive. Prototypes yield a concentration increase of around 0.1% per passage, though Dr Vetrovec thinks his team can raise this to 0.4%. The key, though, is the repetition. Like the tale about a vizier who asked his king, as a reward for some service, for a grain of rice on the first square of a chess board, two grains on the second, four on the third, and so on, the oxygen concentration rises rapidly with successive iterations. Thirty passages at the higher rate would yield a 90% concentration of oxygen—and that would be commercially useful.

Whether this approach actually will prove cheaper than the established alternatives, and whether, if it does, that will really save fossil fuels’ bacon, remain to be seen. But some versions of a green-energy future involve the use of a lot of hydrogen, so better ways of generating that gas are always welcome. In the meantime, oxygen’s many other users would surely welcome a cheaper source of supply. The idea of doing this with magnets is attractive.

Source: The Economist


【自然科学-天文】
Mercury has molten core,radar reveals
( WSY -446 字 短精读)


Source: WSY


【自然科学-生物】
Early Mammals Had Social Lives, Too
(Scientific American-2分26秒-328字-精听)

先做听力再核对原文哦~


Seventy-six million years ago, a group of small mammals huddled in a burrow in what’s now Montana. They were good diggers—most likely furry—and petite.

“They could sit comfortably in the palm of your hand. These things, if you saw them running around today, you’d think it’s a small rodent—a chipmunk or mouse.”

Lucas Weaver is a mammal paleobiologist at University of Washington.

These little creatures didn’t belong to any of the three main mammal groups on the planet today—which are the placental mammals (like us), monotremes (like the platypus) and marsupials (like koalas and kangaroos).

Instead they belonged to another, now extinct group called the “multituberculates.”

“They have these really bizarre molars with multiple bumps, which is where they get their name. Multituberculate. just means ‘many bumps.’”

Weaver and his colleagues have studied the fossilized skulls and skeletons of these animals, dug up in Montana, and they’ve given them a name: Filikomys primaevus (friendly or neighborly mouse).

The details are in the journal Nature Ecology & Evolution.

Weaver says drought or climate change may have killed the animals, though it’s hard to be sure. But the critters were fossilized together in ways that suggest they sought out each others’ company. That’s a big deal because it’s commonly thought that social behavior didn’t arise in mammals until after the death of the dinosaurs, 10 million years after these small critters hung out together.

“The narrative, for decades, has been that mammals living during the time of dinosaurs were mostly solitary ratlike creatures scuttling in the night under dinosaurs. And so the fact we’re finding these multituberculate mammals—a totally unrelated group of mammals—exhibiting social behavior means this was probably not uncommon among these early Mesozoic mammals. And it changes the narrative that sociality is somehow unique to placental mammals.”

Even today, social behavior is relatively rare among mammals. But these findings suggest the need for company in some mammalian species is an ancient evolutionary invention.

Source: Scientific American


【笔记格式要求】
同学们任选 2 篇文章精读/精听并进行笔记打卡

精读笔记格式要求:
1.总结文章中心大意
2.总结分论点或每段段落大意
3.摘抄印象深刻或者觉得优美的句子
4.总结文章中的生词
5.记录阅读时间、总结时间、总时间

精听笔记格式要求:
1.逐句听写整篇文章
2.对照原文修改听写稿,标记出错原因
3.总结文章中心大意
4.总结精听过程中的生词
5.记录听写时间、总结时间、总时间

这里也给大家三点学习小建议哦~
精读:如遇到读不懂的复杂句,建议找出句子主干,分析句子成分,也可以尝试翻译句子来帮助理解~
精听:建议每句不要反复纠结听,如果听 5 遍都没听出来,那就跳过,等完成后再回听总结原因,时间宝贵,不要过于执着哦~



本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2021-2-16 08:44:58 | 只看该作者
D 9

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
板凳
发表于 2021-2-16 09:11:20 | 只看该作者
dududu

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
地板
发表于 2021-2-16 09:27:56 | 只看该作者
自然科学-化学
文章大意:介绍了一种通过磁场以较低成本提取氧气的方式,并给出正评价。
1、纯氧在工业的重要性,且成本一年高达$28bn~$49bn
2、工业亟需一种低成本提取纯氧的方式,因此一个从大气磁场来提取氧气的方式得到了美国能源部的赞助。
3、介绍传统两种提取氧气的方式,并引出新方法:磁场分离法by Dr Vetrovec
4、介绍这种方式的基本原理:不断地用磁场吸引氧气
5、之前有人想到用electromagnet来用通过同样方式来提取氧气,但成本高昂;V是式样大气压力来吸引,成本较低。
6、Aqwest附带的新发明是一种microchannel来运输氧气
7、评价:这个方法在于不断地重复。尽管这种新方法是否有效有待验证,但和替代方法相比,这个方法辣菜成功。

阅读:10min 总结:25min

自然科学-天文
文章大意:进一步验证水星内核存在液体的观点
1、水星内核是否存在液体一直是天文界旷日长久的争论
2、争论形成原因:水星距离太阳近应该存在液体,但因为阳光和星球形成的热度相比可以忽略不计且水星质量较小,所以可能也不存在液体。
3、举例争议:1974的研究说有,但研究可以被反驳
4、新研究通过测量水星转动的变化——如果内核存在液体,solar gravity会对水星公转代理很大影响。
5、通过6年的研究,水星公转的变化是比假定水星内核无液体的变化的两倍,对此最有可能的解释就是水星的outer core只可能是液体,在进一步给出sulfur作用的猜想,并推广到其他planets。

Long-simmering一触即发、酝酿已久的【simmer 文火炖、(冲突)酝酿】 negligible可以忽略不计的 infiltrate渗透

阅读5min 总结:20min


5#
发表于 2021-2-16 09:36:43 | 只看该作者
day 9。2/16打卡

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
6#
发表于 2021-2-16 11:24:52 | 只看该作者
打卡!

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
7#
发表于 2021-2-16 11:27:26 | 只看该作者
Day 9, Feb 16, 21
阅读1
生词:vital 至关重要的;metaphorically 隐喻地;pharmaceutical 药物;sequester 扣押,隔离;liquefaction 液化;distillation 精馏;porous 多孔的;zeolite 沸石;membrane 细胞膜,薄膜;permeable 有渗透性的laminar flow 层流;successive 连续的,接替的;iteracion 迭代次数,反复。
主旨大意:文章介绍了一种新的,经济实惠的制氧方式,通过永久磁场多次提纯制造氧气。目前这种方法还处于构思阶段。
段落大意及分论点:
1.        氧气非常重要,纯氧也是,这个市场价值在280亿-490亿之间,但其实这个市值还被低估了,因为氧气可以用来清洁地生产氢气,解决温室效应,但要控制制氧的成本。
2.        干燥空气中氧气含量21%,目前纯氧的生产方式主要是靠液化并精馏空气,另一种则是靠氧气集中,要么通过透气薄膜把空气中的其他气体吸掉,要么把氧气吸出来。
3.        氧气其实也能被磁场吸引,虽然不像铁一样永久吸引,但氧气的确会在磁场最强的地方聚集中,通过一遍遍的集中,氧气纯度就能提高到需要的比例。曾经的尝试是用电磁场,需要高压,成本很高,V博士尝试做出正常大气压下永久磁场的制氧设备,这样会大大降低成本。
4.        这种新的设备主要是用上了直径不足一毫米的纤维管,可以保证其中液体的层流,即不会产生乱流,所以空气成分不会混合。气体每通过一次聚集效应就增加0.1%,把聚集后的气体再聚集,三十次后就能产生90%纯度的氧气。
5.        无论这种方式是不是更便宜,或者节省了化石能源,这种方式都很不错。
阅读时间9分钟

阅读2
生词:innermost 最里面的;negligible 微不足道的;formation 形成,构造;solidified 固化的;sloshing 晃动,冲激;remnant 剩余;crust 地壳;
主旨大意:科学家曾认为水星是固态的,后来通过研究水星的旋转确认水星核心是液态的。
段落大意及分论点:
1.        最新的雷达研究证明水星核心至少部分是液态的。
2.        阳光的热量不是水星液态核心的主要原因,主要还是星星构造时期留下来的热量,科学家以为水星早就固化了。
3.        1974年太空船发现水星有磁场,像地球这种岩石行星磁场都是液态核心里的带电物质晃动导致的,或者可能是残留在水星地壳里的。而最新关于水星旋转的研究证实太阳引力使得水星自转发生了变化,而液态星核会使太阳引力作用更强。
4.        通过研究雷达波科学家发现自转的变化是预计的,固态核心的水星的变化的两倍,所以水星至少外核是液态的。原因可能是硫渗入了铁元素核心使熔点降低。
阅读5分钟
8#
发表于 2021-2-16 11:40:02 | 只看该作者
Day9

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
9#
发表于 2021-2-16 11:53:30 | 只看该作者
打卡~

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
10#
发表于 2021-2-16 12:08:54 | 只看该作者
打开第九天。

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-6-10 05:06
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部