present information究竟是不是表明作者无态度呢？求NN解答~~~

叮叮车

prep，56题的这一篇文章，答案选C，但是我不太明白，整篇文章作者究竟有没有态度，还是中立地说各种观点。
因为作者在全文都没有表示态度的词语，所以他有可能是中立的。
但是，作者先给了一个引用观点，后面应该是作者自己的观点，评价这个引用观点。

我纠结的点是：1、正确选项的present information是意味着作者有态度还是无态度呢？？（我个人认为无态度）
                       2、文章究竟有没有作者态度呢？？如果无态度的话整篇文章就很奇怪啊啊~~~先给了一个引用观点，然后全文无态度的各种评价。。。晕。。。



The primary purpose of the passage is to

• Aidentify the origin of a common misconception
• Bdiscuss the implications of a generally accepted principle
• Cpresent information relevant in evaluating a commonly held belief
• Ddefend a controversial assertion against a variety of counterarguments
• Eexplain under what circumstances a well-known phenomenon occurs
• 看了闫晨晨老师的网课，我现在做阅读都超级注重作者态度的~所以对这篇文章好纠结。希望各位NN解答一下！感谢感谢！
  

（为了方便阅读，贴一下全文~
Many people believe that because wages are lower in developing countries than in developed countries, competition from developing countries in goods traded internationally will soon eliminate large numbers of jobs in developed countries. Currently, developed countries' advanced technology results in higher productivity, which accounts for their higher wages. Advanced technology is being transferred ever more speedily across borders, but even with the latest technology, productivity and wages in developing countries will remain lower than in developed countries for many years because developed countries have better infrastructure and better-educated workers. When productivity in a developing country does catch up, experience suggests that wages there will rise. Some individual firms in developing countries have raised their productivity but kept their wages (which are influenced by average productivity in the country's economy) low. However, in a developing country's economy as a whole, productivity improvements in goods traded internationally are likely to cause an increase in wages. Furthermore, if wages are not allowed to rise, the value of the country's currency will appreciate, which (from the developed countries' point of view) is the equivalent of increased wages in the developing country. And although in the past a few countries have deliberately kept their currencies undervalued, that is now much harder to do in a world where capital moves more freely.

叮叮车

自顶

AlanHeeee

首先回答问题
present information不能确定是什么态度，有没有态度我也不知道，有态度这个能选，中立态度（没有态度）这个也能选
So，不要纠结这个
绝对不能有先入为主什么是对的预设。得分选项一定得有作者态度？没有不行吗

这题挺典型
我讲一下什么叫信息类阅读的做题原则

第一步，看已知信息寻找突破口
什么是已知信息，题干和选项
题干问主旨，然后溜一下选项，发现都是虚的，一点具体内容都没有
这就是一个提示，我根本不要去看具体内容，只要看句与句之间的关系就行了
然后读原文
“很多人认为什么，现在又怎么样了，但是什么什么是因为什么，当什么，什么就怎么着了。但是什么什么（一直到结尾）”
来看选项
A. 确定了一个误解的来源。杀，原文有两个但是，说明逻辑方向有两次不一致，匹配不了这个说法
B. 讨论了一个原则的运用。杀，和应用扯不上关系
C. 展现了一些信息（和什么有关？）和一些普遍相信的东西。留着，这个说法很虚，很难说错，杀不掉
D. 捍卫了一个有争议的说法通过驳斥一些对他的驳斥。有点沾边，留着
E. 不写了，无关。和两个但是对不上

留下C和D，C更虚，如果选D，那C一定对，那么就只能选C，结束。

作者有没有态度，who care？
PS: 网上那些网课，除了GWD，其他都是误人子弟，还不如自己看