OG 2020 CR 747求助#兽医接不接受促销？

余饭饭

Veterinarians generally derive some of their income from selling several manufacturers' lines of pet-care products. Knowing that pet owners rarely throw away mail from their pet's veterinarian unread, one manufacturer of pet-care products offered free promotional materials on its products to veterinarians for mailing to their clients. Very few veterinarians accepted the offer, however, even though the manufacturer`s products are of high quality.

A  Most of the veterinarians to whom the free promotional materials were offered were already selling the manufacturer`s pet-care products to their clients.

B  The special promotional materials were intended as a supplement to the manufacturer's usual promotional activities rather than as a replacement for them.

C  The manufacturer`s products, unlike most equally good competing products sold by veterinarians, are also available in pet stores and in supermarkets.

D  Many pet owners have begun demanding quality in products they buy for their pets that is as high as that in products they buy for themselves.

E  Veterinarians sometimes recommend that pet owners use products formulated for people when no suitable product specially formulated for animals is available.

OA是C这道题我也是错好几遍了哎，每次都是选A。我感觉逻辑题就是如果一开始没进出题人定的那个圈子就很容易走入错。。。

我的想法是：题目类型：resolve the paradox

P1 兽医可以通过帮忙卖生厂商的东西得到收入
P2: 要卖的产品质量好 P3:寄送的是促销品按道理兽医应该接受这个proposal
P4: 很多兽医拒绝了
why?

我首先的想法是：兽医卖这个东西得不到收入，所以才愿意mail，所以答案应该是解释为什么这个方案让兽医得不到收入

我最后留下了A和C选项，

A我的理解是既然兽医已经在卖了，那兽医和 manufacturer是竞争者的关系，这个方案肯定会让兽医收入减少

C我的理解是虽然超市和商店也有卖，但是兽医相当于帮商家卖货和打广告，商店有卖就不能挣这个钱了嘛？寄送免费的促销材料可以挖掘更多的潜在消费者，商家、兽医和消费者三方受利。

我感觉可能我的中式思维让我把兽医的作用理解成了推广的up主或者主播。。。求NN们指点~感谢

AlanHeeee

A无关，只接受不要做任何的推理，因为你对什么叫“严密性的客观推理”根本没有概念

A中兽医已经卖这个厂家的其他产品了，卖就卖呗。和原文中说的产品卖的怎么样有什么关系？你凭什么得出这两种产品是竞争关系？

余饭饭

AlanHeeee 发表于 2019-11-11 20:23
A无关，只接受不要做任何的推理，因为你对什么叫“严密性的客观推理”根本没有概念

A中兽医已经卖这个厂家 ...

嗷，是我加太多额外的assumption了，谢谢~