ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: 相叶忍
打印 上一主题 下一主题

【阅读】2019/03/02起樾都寂静整理(03/10日更新, 34篇原始,34篇考古)

[精华] [复制链接]
11#
发表于 2019-3-4 19:28:04 | 只看该作者

其实跟19年1月13的库重复更多,数学感觉也有几题是这个库出的,你可以看一下
12#
发表于 2019-3-4 19:29:14 | 只看该作者
Lucas-Heathen 发表于 2019-3-3 21:59
能不能麻烦你Po一下328的链接 谢谢你

https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-1336789-1-1.html 你看看这个吧,这个更像
13#
发表于 2019-3-4 22:37:48 | 只看该作者



The Norm of Reciprocity in Western History

第一段: 亚当斯密和另外两个人提出了自由市场经济理论,也遭到很多人的反对~然后说这个自由市场经济理论最重要的的就是"norm of reciprocal"(应该是这么拼的,但是看不懂那个reciprocal,郁闷死了)
第二段 就讲这个norm of reciprocal不仅仅是***(好像是说不仅仅是支撑着自由市场经济理论) 而且还是人类natural的什么什么。然后还讲了亚当斯密的invisble hand~
记得第一题是说: 下面关于自由市场经济理论那个是对的? 我选啥给忘了



Beginning with Thomas Hobbes's observations that individuals give up part of their autonomy in return for protection, the notion in political philosophy of a norm of reciprocity as a fundamental principle in human society entered into these speculations to justify the rise of a free-market economy without state interventions. John Locke's seventeenth-century view of private property set out in the second treatise and, in the next century, Adam Smith's notion of the "invisible hand" that keeps the market secure from external controls, are only two among many philosophical theories of the times in which the norm of reciprocity was fundamental to how the market could operate autonomously.

Reciprocity was elevated to a moving force in these discussions. If reciprocity was natural to economic endeavors, then the give and take of market interests eventually would balance out, regardless of individual greed or misappropriation. The Scots economist, Sir James Steuart, who predated Durkheim by more than a century, proclaimed that the economic ties that linked people through the division of labor as producers of different commodities were the "cement binding society together." If any adjustments were needed, a "statesman" would only have to create "reciprocal wants" by "gently" loading the opposite scale. Reciprocity continued to hold this privileged place because it remained the key to the market's stability which, at best, needed only slight encouragement. Adam Smith sustained the most powerful argument for the absence of external intervention precisely because Smith believed, even more than Steuart, that the reciprocal give and take of the marketplace would accommodate its own adjustments without need for even gentle control. His philosophy was that when people enter into reciprocal exchange they become better people.


14#
发表于 2019-3-7 10:03:47 | 只看该作者
对比老的寂静,发现本次阅读已出现的基本全部都可以在今年1月13号的考古里找到,数学倒是没有
15#
发表于 2019-3-7 12:08:22 | 只看该作者
感谢分享!               
16#
发表于 2019-3-7 16:37:48 | 只看该作者
轻微的况且我们店里看我去年
17#
发表于 2019-3-7 16:53:11 | 只看该作者
附件里面没有113的基经啊!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
18#
发表于 2019-3-7 20:36:26 | 只看该作者
妇女选举 1月13那期有考到
19#
发表于 2019-3-8 07:53:30 | 只看该作者
1/13 附件没有, 这个是链接:
https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-1336789-1-1.html
20#
发表于 2019-3-8 08:37:53 | 只看该作者
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/41111573_Rules_for_Biologically_Inspired_Adaptive_Network_Design

东京铁路原文,science文章,不能复制,有需要的可以去读读,挺长的。。。。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-15 12:51
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部