ChaseDream
搜索
12
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: iiiiin
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[原始] 10.15第一次放狗 三战没分手

[精华] [复制链接]
11#
发表于 2018-10-17 00:55:42 | 只看该作者
感谢楼主!你说的阅读第三题,是和这个差不多吗~
In Winters v. United States (1908), the Supreme Court held that the right to use waters flowing through or adjacent to the Fort Belknap Indian Reservation was reserved to American Indians by the treaty establishing the reservation. Although this treaty did not mention water rights, the Court ruled that the federal government, when it created the reservation, intended to deal fairly with American Indians by reserving for them the waters without which their lands would have been useless. Later decisions, citing Winters, established that courts can find federal rights to reserve water for particular purposes if (1) the land in question lies within an enclave under exclusive federal jurisdiction, (2) the land has been formally withdrawn from federal public lands—i.e., withdrawn from the stock of federal lands available for private use under federal land use laws—and set aside or reserved, and (3) the circumstances reveal the government intended to reserve water as well as land when establishing the reservation.
Some American Indian tribes have also established water rights through the courts based on their traditional diversion and use of certain waters prior to the United States’ acquisition of sovereignty. For example, the Rio Grande pueblos already existed when the United States acquired sovereignty over New Mexico in 1848. Although they at that time became part of the United States, the pueblo lands never formally constituted a part of federal public lands; in any event, no treaty, statute, or executive order has ever designated or withdrawn the pueblos from public lands as American Indian reservations. This fact, however, has not barred application of the Winters doctrine. What constitutes an American Indian reservation is a question of practice, not of legal definition, and the pueblos have always been treated as reservations by the United States. This pragmatic approach is buttressed by Arizona v. California (1963), wherein the Supreme Court indicated that the manner in which any type of federal reservation is created does not affect the application to it of the Winters doctrine. Therefore, the reserved water rights of Pueblo Indians have priority over other citizens’ water rights as of 1848, the year in which pueblos must be considered to have become reservations.
12#
发表于 2018-10-17 09:04:26 | 只看该作者
楼主超级可爱呀!!!心态真好
一定要加油哦 我们等你的好消息!!!!!!
13#
 楼主| 发表于 2018-10-17 10:38:07 | 只看该作者
安宁1997 发表于 2018-10-17 09:04
楼主超级可爱呀!!!心态真好
一定要加油哦 我们等你的好消息!!!!!! ...

同意!               
14#
发表于 2018-10-17 15:47:26 | 只看该作者
求边长为 1686cm 的cube的mass。 1. 已知边长为 2896cm 的cube的mass。 2. 已知一个rectangle cube的一边长686cm的mass。 (数字编的)楼主,问一下这道题是什么意思啊,还有这个mass!
15#
发表于 2018-10-22 12:46:00 | 只看该作者
Kwoncey 发表于 2018-10-17 15:47
求边长为 1686cm 的cube的mass。 1. 已知边长为 2896cm 的cube的mass。 2. 已知一个rectangle cube的一边 ...

这个是求立方体的质量(mass of cube),知道比了之后就可以推算出1686的质量
16#
发表于 2019-2-23 13:25:15 | 只看该作者
Moonsu 发表于 2018-10-22 12:46
这个是求立方体的质量(mass of cube),知道比了之后就可以推算出1686的质量 ...

同意!               
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-13 17:14
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部