求解一道prep07的题

Nam-Katherina

Companies O and P each have the same number of employeeswho work the same number of hours per week. According to records maintained by each company, the employees ofCompany O had fewer job-related accidents last year than did the employees ofCompany P.  Therefore, employees ofCompany O are less likely to have job-related accidents than are employees ofCompany P.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken theconclusion?

(A) The employees of Company P lost more time at work dueto job-related accidents than did the employees of Company O.

(B) Company P considered more types of accidents to bejob-related than did Company O.

(C) The employees of Company P were sick more often thanwere the employees of Company O.

(D) Several employees of Company O each had more than onejob-related accident.

(E) The majority of job-related accidents at Company Oinvolved a single machine.

这道题我选了B, 我总感觉D和事故数量无关，起不了削弱作用。请大神们解答一下我的困惑

L.M.

EMMMM那啥，我的prep上怎么答案是B。。。

不管了，跟LZ分析一下这个题吧：

Argument：
P1： O P两企业员工数量一样，工作时间一样
P2：O的工伤比P的少
C：O的员工 less likely to have accidents than P的员工

A：P的员工因为工伤损失了更多的时间。只讨论宏观的工伤率的问题，未说明与工作时间缩短的关系。
B：P将更多的accident看成了工伤。也就说P的工伤数据虚高，有可能O工伤 > P工伤。可以选。
C：P的员工比O的员工更容易生病。与A类似，P1明确给出了前提（工时一样长，员工一样多），生不生病没有关联。
D：一些O的员工很背时，多次受工伤。但我觉得这个并不能动摇O的工伤数量少的事实。它只给出了微观的分布情况，但我们需要知道的是宏观的总量。因此我觉得这个选项没有关联。
E：O的工伤与一台机器有关。同D，只给出了微观的工伤分布情况，但这里讨论的是总数。

综上，我也想选B。

kluivert

菜鸟想说这题绝对b
楼上分析很到位了

vicar

这题蛮奇怪的，我一开始认为工伤按照各公司定义所以没得选，其实工伤是有一个客观存在不为公司主观意见所转移的，那就选b了