ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: 宋痂岛__
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[备考心经] 690-730-790三战分手放方法放经验放感悟放建议

[精华]   [复制链接]
181#
发表于 2018-5-29 10:14:56 | 只看该作者
我又来骚扰啦。关于RC想请教岛,在读RC文章的过程中,你会怎么样去分析思考这篇文章,这次我实战的时候,感觉只是被动阅读(明白内容,但感觉缺乏主动思考),所以能不能请岛以下面这篇GWD的文章为例,示范一下你在读到文章的时候,会以什么样的方式去分析思考,就像你说的从句子之内思考到句子之外,从句子之间思考到段落之间,培养整体的思考模式。想通过岛的分析去了解自己还欠缺的地方,非常感谢(鞠躬

In mid-February 1917 a women's movement independent of political affiliation erupted in New York City, the stronghold of the Socialist party in the United states. Protesting against the high cost of living, thousands of women refused to buy chickens, fish, and vegetables. The boycott shut. down much of the City's foodstuffs marketing for two weeks, riveting public attention on the issue of food prices, which had increased partly as a result of increased exports of food to Europe that had been occurring since the outbreak of the First World War. By early 1917 the Socialist party had established itself as a major political presence in New York City. New York Socialists, whose customary spheres of struggle were electoral work and trade union organizing, seized the opportunity and quickly organized an extensive series of cost-of-living protests designed to direct the women's movement toward Socialist goals. Underneath the Socialists' brief commitment to cost-of-living organizing lay a basic indifference to the issue itself. While some Socialists did view price protests as a direct step toward socialism, most Socialists ultimately sought to divert the cost-of-living movement into alternative channels of protest. Union organizing, they argued, was the best method through which to combat the high cost of living. For others, cost-of-living or oganizing was valuable insofar as it led women into the struggle for suffrage, and similarly, the suffrage struggle was valuable insofar as it moved United States society one step closer to socialism.

Although New York's Socialists saw the cost-of-living issue as, at best ,secondary or tertiary to the real task at hand, the boycotters, by sharp contrast, joined the price protest movement out of an urgent and deeply felt commitment to the cost-of-living issue. A shared experience of swiftly declining living standards caused by rising food prices drove these women to protest. Consumer organizing spoke directly to their daily lives and concerns; they saw cheaper food as a valuable end in itself. Food price protests were these women's way of organizing at their own workplace, as workers whose occupation was shopping and preparing food for their families.
182#
发表于 2018-5-30 11:50:43 | 只看该作者
宋痂岛__ 发表于 2018-5-23 11:47
没关系,这样才对

小岛~
我最近复习很少遇到看了答案还confused的语法题,但是下面这道题我觉得有点迷,想请你指教
Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than nonunion members to be enrolled in lower-end insurance plans imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend less time with each.
A imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend
B imposing stricter limits on medical services , requiring doctors to see more patients, and spending
C that impose stricter limits on medical services, require doctors to see more patients, and spend
D that impose stricter limits on medical services and require doctors to see more patients, spending
E that impose stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients and spending
问题集中在A和E上。
Ron在视频里说答案是A,但是我觉得A的结构requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend,这里的and显然他是想和see more patients平行,但是没有逗号不是更好吗?加了逗号难道不是有和前面imposing stricter limits...这些修饰平行的嫌疑吗
也有论坛说答案是D,但是D项逗号+spending这个修饰记得只能修饰前面that引导的从句的主语或者整句话?如果是的话,那么逻辑语义就不对了。
183#
发表于 2018-5-30 14:15:21 | 只看该作者
谢谢分享,能不能给个群号啊?
184#
发表于 2018-5-30 14:33:50 来自手机 | 只看该作者
楼主好棒啊!
185#
发表于 2018-5-30 14:40:03 | 只看该作者
嗷嗷嗷我可爱的数讨君!!!顺便吸吸欧气!!
186#
 楼主| 发表于 2018-5-30 22:04:12 | 只看该作者
Jinnjenny23 发表于 2018-5-29 10:14
我又来骚扰啦。关于RC想请教岛,在读RC文章的过程中,你会怎么样去分析思考这篇文章,这次我实战的时候,感 ...

稍微等等,我来回复,不好意思看到的比较晚
187#
发表于 2018-5-30 23:24:10 | 只看该作者
宋痂岛__ 发表于 2018-5-30 22:04
稍微等等,我来回复,不好意思看到的比较晚

没关系的没关系的,特别谢谢你能抽出时间来解答问题
188#
 楼主| 发表于 2018-5-31 00:55:56 | 只看该作者
小岛最近很压抑啊
189#
 楼主| 发表于 2018-5-31 01:14:39 | 只看该作者
阿尔的阳光 发表于 2018-5-30 11:50
小岛~
我最近复习很少遇到看了答案还confused的语法题,但是下面这道题我觉得有点迷,想请你指教
Among l ...

这道题我选D。印象很深。给你点思路
1.把平行的几个句子拆分开来,我们来单独看他的意思,然后判断他们到底属于哪个平行意群
平行意群是我自己认识的观念,也就是将出现模糊平行的对象进行意思上的归类,我们可以把英语转化为中文来练习这种思路,有助于去分析词组之间,句子之间,成分结构之间的关系
2.comma doing在语意上的功能有三种:further description,immediate result and subordinate action.那我们来看D选项,spending是不是和see more parents 主语一致,动作同时进行,后是前的immediate result.那么既然在这样and后的成分中,comma doing的功能也是实行的只不过,我们常见的是comma doing修饰一整个句子。但是我想一想会发现,comma doing之所以作为这样的描述功能存在,是因为它本身也在提示语意上的重心区别,前大于后,而and则是重心相等…从这个层面上理解,我想强调and后的一个成分,用comma doing来修饰它,是不是也可以呢?因为语法是工具,那么只要是能看懂,能表达和体现出我的表达立场表达中心,那样就ok啦~所以D虽然少见 但是偶尔这样用也可以。没有绝对的原则comma doing一定修饰一个句子,因为这样的原则也是总结出来的而并不是,从具体的语意出发。一定要具体情况具体分析!
190#
 楼主| 发表于 2018-5-31 01:18:33 | 只看该作者
Jinnjenny23 发表于 2018-5-30 23:24
没关系的没关系的,特别谢谢你能抽出时间来解答问题

rc文章分析 我给你分析一段时间明天发上来
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-24 06:42
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部