- UID
- 1191019
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2016-2-14
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers is a costly mistake, because all its labor disputes must then be settled by binding arbitration, without any negotiated public-sector labor settlements guiding the arbitrators. Strikes should be outlawed only for categories of public-sector workers for whose services no acceptable substitute exists.
The statements above best support which of the following conclusions?
(A) Where public-service workers are permitted to strike, contract negotiations with those workers are typically settled without a strike.
(B) Where strikes by all categories of pubic-sector workers are outlawed, no acceptable substitutes for the services provided by any of those workers are available.
(C) Binding arbitration tends to be more advantageous for public-service workers where it is the only available means of settling labor disputes with such workers.
(D) Most categories of public-sector workers have no counterparts in the private sector.
(E) A strike by workers in a local government is unlikely to be settled without help from an arbitrator.
OA:C
当地政府订其员工的所有罢工为违法将是一个严重错误,而必将付出沉重代价。因为所有劳工纠纷都由。。。。
从binding arbitration开始就不明白了。
|
|