- UID
- 988424
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2014-3-12
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
當然看過program structure才說的. 也不是說不能申請, 而是the master is not for this purpose. (當然, 不是for academic purpose的master有沒有空間變回一個good preparation是另一個問題)
補充一點, 其實不應該說沒有, 而應該說core沒有.
Q: core 沒有, elective有不就行了嗎?
A: 你把elective用來補基本的core的時候, 人家早就在上advanced topic course和seminar了........
P.S.1 yes for 5302, but not the asset pricing 4304. What a asset pricing course in an academics financial economics program cover not this set of topic, but some more advanced and theoretical topic. Basically Cochrane. this 4304 is a really practical quantitative model for finance class, but it is not something people talk about asset pricing in academic economic and finance. (sometimes it is called theortical asset pricing, asset pricing or financial economics......this course is a must for any academics economics and finance master)
P.S.2 agree with the fast track part is a positive signal. and agree with a the PhD Finance in SSE is a good one. but don't think "have a good PhD program" imply that the master must be a good preparation for that.
P.S.3 其實所謂academic vs practical master的分別, 不只是名稱(e.g. MPhil vs MSc), 長短的分別, 也是內容分別, 更是學生心態的分別.
舉個例, 選課, 學術的就偏理論, 打好基礎, 打算就業的就以實用為首要.
network, 學術的就是network top/active researcher, know more about research frontier, practical的自然是多network working alumni and etc....
平時part-time, summer 要intern, 玩學術的自然拼便找research assistant, practical的自然是多申幾間公司..........
所以就算沒有名稱上的分別, 單單看program structure, 遴選方法等等都會略知一二.
兩者可以兼容嗎? 難, 除了很少的field外, 兩邊的內容是不重覆的.........而人要睡覺, 時間有限.
|
|