一道逻辑评价题

还要昵称好麻烦

Journalist: Well-known businessman Arnold Bergeron has long been popular in the state, and he has often talked about running for governor, but he has never run. However, we have just learned that Bergeron has fulfilled the financial disclosure requirement for candidacy by submitting a detailed list of his current financial holdings to the election commission. So, it is very likely that Bergeron will be a candidate for governor this year.

The answer to which of the following questions would be most useful in evaluating the journalist's argument?
AHas anybody else who has fulfilled the financial disclosure requirement for the upcoming election reported greater financial holdings than Bergeron?  
BIs submitting a list of holdings the only way to fulfill the election commission's financial disclosure requirements?  
CDid the information recently obtained by the journalists come directly from the election commission?  
DHave Bergeron's financial holdings increased in value in recent years?  
EHad Bergeron also fulfilled the financial disclosure requirements for candidacy before any previous gubernatorial elections?  
题目问的是candidate，E为什么对

Bradz

记者的argument是：B刚刚满足了成为候选人的一个条件，所以他今年会参加竞选。

E问的是B以前有没有满足过这个条件？如果满足过，而过去B没有参加过竞选，那么满足条件不能代表他会参加竞选；如果没满足过，那么这可以被看做他会参加竞选的一个征兆。