ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: thorn8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

【阅读】5.06起悦读鸡精~(5.18 更新至46 21:08)

[精华]   [复制链接]
61#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-5-14 10:58:49 | 只看该作者
700gogogo 发表于 2016-5-13 15:42
阅读君,貌似hunter的消失和游牧民族的消失是同一篇..............

我也不知道。。感觉强行合成一篇又有点怪怪的。。。。所以就搞成俩了。。。
62#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-5-14 10:59:39 | 只看该作者
nmamazon 发表于 2016-5-14 00:41
Q6 - 的背景因该是一个叫Jared Diamond 1999 的观点,符合JJ的:
http://erenow.com/common/gunsgermssteel ...

猴猴猴~~~感谢你哈~~我加上去~~~=3333=!!!!
63#
发表于 2016-5-14 11:41:29 | 只看该作者
为什么下载区里是语法寂静……
64#
发表于 2016-5-14 14:11:47 | 只看该作者
主页君下载区是愈发的。赶紧换一下吧
65#
发表于 2016-5-14 14:16:01 | 只看该作者
thorn8 发表于 2016-5-14 10:59
猴猴猴~~~感谢你哈~~我加上去~~~=3333=!!!!

主页君传错寂静了,麻烦赶紧换一下
66#
发表于 2016-5-14 14:35:15 | 只看该作者
阅读君,又发成语法了
67#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-5-14 17:00:36 | 只看该作者
700gogogo 发表于 2016-5-14 14:35
阅读君,又发成语法了

..........Q.Q我哭瞎
68#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-5-14 17:04:25 | 只看该作者
geanna77 发表于 2016-5-14 14:11
主页君下载区是愈发的。赶紧换一下吧

是是是。。我弄错了 骚瑞
69#
发表于 2016-5-14 18:30:20 | 只看该作者
thorn8 发表于 2016-5-14 17:04
是是是。。我弄错了 骚瑞

辛苦啦
70#
发表于 2016-5-14 22:33:37 | 只看该作者
挺确定q12是从McKinsey Quarterly 2007/04 的一片文章讨论Organizational Change...
读文章可以看出这答案因该是对的。。。

OQ2: 那一项符合作者的建议?
A) 调查各个部门的员工和哪些其他部门的员工在工作中产生较多的交集。

OQ6: 要达到老板想要达到的目的,作者建议?
A) 调查各个部门的员工和哪些其他部门的员工在工作中产生较多的交集,迷惑项有什么什么
formalrelationship 不对,因为作者想要强调的是imformalrelationship



http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/the-role-of-networks-in-organizational-changeA Few years ago, the world’s leading designer and manufacturer of office products decided that it needed an organizational overhaul. Coordination across product lines was poor. Design teams collaborated ineffectively. Key personnel were remote from customers. The company responded in part by reorganizing its work space, creating an office-free “village” where designers and architects could mingle and collaborate and customers could visit easily. Proximity does matter for promoting collaboration, and the space was conceptually compelling and visually appealing. Yet it failed to spark meaningful innovation or closer relationships with customers. Four and a half years after the building opened, management decided to revamp the work space again.

A key part of the problem is that the boxes and lines of formal organizational charts mask myriad relationships in networks that crisscross the borders of functions, hierarchies, and business units. These networks define the way work actually gets done in today’s increasingly collaborative, knowledge-intensive companies. Little wonder that total-quality-management projects and the reengineering of business processes—to take just two examples of organizational-change efforts that largely ignore these essential but invisible networks—fail at least two-thirds of the time.

In our experience, companies that invest time and energy to understand their networks and collaborative relationships greatly improve their chances of making successful organizational changes. Sophisticated approaches can map networks and identify the key points of connectivity where value is created or destroyed.1A network approach can help companies to make change stick by working through influential employees, to focus on points in the network where relationships should be expanded or reduced, and to measure the effectiveness of major initiatives.






您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-27 17:01
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部